📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Jul 14 →
Wins
3
Losses
3
Win %
50%
Pending
0
Wed 10/21 Tue 10/20 Mon 10/19 Sun 10/18 Sat 10/17 Fri 10/16 Thu 10/15 Wed 10/14 Tue 10/13 Mon 10/12 Sun 10/11 Sat 10/10 Fri 10/9 Thu 10/8
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
WSH @ TORONT WNBA
Rebounds 3.5 OVER
72.1 B
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
58
Clean
28.1
Fit
5
2
WSH @ TORONT WNBA
Assists 7.5 OVER
71.3 B
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
60
Clean
28.1
Fit
5
3
WSH @ TORONT WNBA
Points 23.5 OVER
62.4 C+
  • Projected edge vs line
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
61
Clean
21.1
Fit
4
4
WSH @ TORONT WNBA
Assists 2.5 OVER
61.4 C+
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
  • Higher volatility than ideal
Raw
45
Clean
25.3
Fit
5

📋 Full Board (64 picks · Page 1/3)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
1 Julie Allemand WSH @ TORONT Rebounds 3.5 72.1 B 28.1 5 Pending
2 Julie Allemand WSH @ TORONT Assists 7.5 71.3 B 28.1 5 Pending
3 Marina Mabrey WSH @ TORONT Points 23.5 62.4 C+ 21.1 4 Pending
4 Maria Conde WSH @ TORONT Assists 2.5 61.4 C+ 25.3 5 Pending
5 Maria Conde WSH @ TORONT Rebounds 4.5 60.1 C+ 25.8 5 Pending
6 Julie Allemand WSH @ TORONT Points 7.5 59.9 C+ 26.7 4 Pending
7 Marina Mabrey WSH @ TORONT Rebounds 3.5 57.7 C+ 20.8 5 Pending
8 Sonia Citron WSH @ TORONT Points 18.5 57 C+ 17.3 4 Pending
9 Leïla Lacan POR @ CON Points 12.5 56.6 C 22.3 4 Pending
10 Maria Conde WSH @ TORONT Points 10.5 56.4 C 27 4 Pending
11 Leïla Lacan POR @ CON Assists 5.5 55.6 C 22.5 5 Pending
12 Marina Mabrey WSH @ TORONT Assists 3.5 55.4 C 21.1 5 Pending
13 Sonia Citron WSH @ TORONT Rebounds 3.5 55.2 C 17.5 5 Pending
14 Charlisse Leger-Walker POR @ CON Points 8.5 54.7 C 21.6 4 Pending
15 Bridget Carleton POR @ CON Rebounds 3.5 53.4 C 16.7 5 Pending
16 Kiki Iriafen WSH @ TORONT Rebounds 10.5 50.6 C 12.7 5 Pending
17 Charlisse Leger-Walker POR @ CON Assists 3.5 50.5 C 20.4 5 Pending
18 Sarah Ashlee Barker POR @ CON Rebounds 4.5 49.5 D 11.6 5 Pending
19 Bridget Carleton POR @ CON Points 13.5 49.2 D 17.2 4 Pending
20 Shakira Austin WSH @ TORONT Rebounds 9.5 46.6 D 11.4 5 Pending
21 Bridget Carleton POR @ CON Assists 2.5 46.2 D 16.3 5 Pending
22 Carla Leite POR @ CON Points 14.5 45.3 D 10.2 4 Pending
23 Michaela Onyenwere WSH @ TORONT Rebounds 2.5 44.9 D 10.7 5 Pending
24 Sonia Citron WSH @ TORONT Assists 3.5 44.6 D 17 5 Pending
25 Carla Leite POR @ CON Rebounds 2.5 43.8 D 9.3 5 Pending
Showing 1–25 of 64 picks
← Prev 1 2 3 Next →

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.