📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Jul 9 – Jul 15 →
Wins
25
Losses
17
Win %
59.5%
Pending
0
Tue 10/20 Mon 10/19 Sun 10/18 Sat 10/17 Fri 10/16 Thu 10/15 Wed 10/14 Tue 10/13 Mon 10/12 Sun 10/11 Sat 10/10 Fri 10/9 Thu 10/8 Wed 10/7
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
LA @ MIN WNBA
Points 19.5 OVER
76.4 B+
  • Projected edge vs line
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
75
Clean
28.4
Fit
4
2
GSV @ IND WNBA
Points 21.5 OVER
73 B
  • Projected edge vs line
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
77
Clean
23.6
Fit
4
3
LA @ MIN WNBA
Rebounds 3.5 OVER
65.1 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
45
Clean
27.1
Fit
5
4
LA @ MIN WNBA
Points 20.5 OVER
60.8 C+
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
55
Clean
22.3
Fit
4

📋 Full Board (104 picks · Page 2/5)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
26 Aliyah Boston GSV @ IND Rebounds 9.5 44.5 D 12.1 5 Pending
27 Kelsey Mitchell GSV @ IND 3-Pointers Made 2.5 43.8 D 14.6 0 Pending
28 Flau'jae Johnson SEA @ CHI Points 13.5 43.8 D 19.7 4 Pending
29 Dearica Hamby LA @ MIN Points 15.5 43.6 D 11.9 4 Pending
30 Natisha Hiedeman SEA @ CHI Points 15.5 42.8 D 10.8 4 Pending
31 Awa Fam SEA @ CHI Points 12.5 41.6 D 20.8 4 Pending
32 Dearica Hamby LA @ MIN Assists 2.5 41.1 D 11.2 5 Pending
33 Natasha Howard LA @ MIN Rebounds 8.5 39.9 D 11 5 Pending
34 Natasha Cloud SEA @ CHI Assists 5.5 39.5 D 11 5 Pending
35 Rae Burrell LA @ MIN Rebounds 2.5 39.4 D 9.8 5 Pending
36 Natasha Howard LA @ MIN Assists 2.5 39.3 D 9.7 5 Pending
37 Rae Burrell LA @ MIN Points 14.5 39.1 D 10.6 4 Pending
38 Rae Burrell LA @ MIN Assists 2.5 38.3 D 9 5 Pending
39 Courtney Williams LA @ MIN Assists 4.5 37.8 D 10 5 Pending
40 Aliyah Boston GSV @ IND Assists 2.5 37.6 D 8.7 5 Pending
41 Dearica Hamby LA @ MIN Rebounds 7.5 37.5 D 11 5 Pending
42 Natasha Cloud SEA @ CHI Points 11.5 36.6 D 10.8 4 Pending
43 Courtney Williams LA @ MIN Points 15.5 36.3 D 11.2 4 Pending
44 Natisha Hiedeman SEA @ CHI Assists 4.5 35 D 11.5 5 Pending
45 Natasha Cloud SEA @ CHI Rebounds 4.5 34.3 D 10.8 5 Pending
46 Nneka Ogwumike LA @ MIN 3-Pointers Made 1.5 31.2 D 11.7 0 Pending
47 Natasha Howard LA @ MIN Points 17.5 31.2 D 11.5 4 Pending
48 Olivia Miles LA @ MIN 3-Pointers Made 1.5 27.6 D 10.7 0 Pending
49 Azura Stevens SEA @ CHI 3-Pointers Made 1.5 26.4 D 10.8 0 Pending
50 Awa Fam SEA @ CHI 3-Pointers Made 1.5 25.4 D 11.7 0 Pending
Showing 26–50 of 104 picks

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.