📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Jul 15 →
Wins
3
Losses
3
Win %
50%
Pending
0
Tue 10/20 Mon 10/19 Sun 10/18 Sat 10/17 Fri 10/16 Thu 10/15 Wed 10/14 Tue 10/13 Mon 10/12 Sun 10/11 Sat 10/10 Fri 10/9 Thu 10/8 Wed 10/7
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
LA @ MIN WNBA
Points 19.5 OVER
76.4 B+
  • Projected edge vs line
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
75
Clean
28.4
Fit
4
2
GSV @ IND WNBA
Points 21.5 OVER
73 B
  • Projected edge vs line
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
77
Clean
23.6
Fit
4
3
LA @ MIN WNBA
Rebounds 3.5 OVER
65.1 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
45
Clean
27.1
Fit
5
4
LA @ MIN WNBA
Points 20.5 OVER
60.8 C+
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
55
Clean
22.3
Fit
4

📋 Full Board (104 picks · Page 1/5)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
1 Kayla McBride LA @ MIN Points 19.5 76.4 B+ 28.4 4 Pending
2 Kelsey Mitchell GSV @ IND Points 21.5 73 B 23.6 4 Pending
3 Kayla McBride LA @ MIN Rebounds 3.5 65.1 B- 27.1 5 Pending
4 Olivia Miles LA @ MIN Points 20.5 60.8 C+ 22.3 4 Pending
5 Nneka Ogwumike LA @ MIN Points 17.5 59 C+ 22.3 4 Pending
6 Kelsey Mitchell GSV @ IND Assists 2.5 58.5 C+ 20.5 5 Pending
7 Olivia Miles LA @ MIN Rebounds 4.5 57.8 C+ 22.6 5 Pending
8 Nneka Ogwumike LA @ MIN Assists 3.5 57.3 C+ 21.7 5 Pending
9 Nneka Ogwumike LA @ MIN Rebounds 8.5 56.7 C 21.8 5 Pending
10 Kayla McBride LA @ MIN Assists 2.5 56.3 C 26.5 5 Pending
11 Awa Fam SEA @ CHI Rebounds 5.5 55.7 C 21.4 5 Pending
12 Olivia Miles LA @ MIN Assists 6.5 55.1 C 22.3 5 Pending
13 Aliyah Boston GSV @ IND Points 15.5 54.2 C 12.3 4 Pending
14 Kamilla Cardoso SEA @ CHI Points 14.5 53.5 C 21.2 4 Pending
15 Kamilla Cardoso SEA @ CHI Rebounds 9.5 53.3 C 21.2 5 Pending
16 Kamilla Cardoso SEA @ CHI Assists 2.5 53.2 C 21.1 5 Pending
17 Flau'jae Johnson SEA @ CHI Rebounds 5.5 53.1 C 20.7 5 Pending
18 Flau'jae Johnson SEA @ CHI Assists 3.5 52.6 C 22 5 Pending
19 Awa Fam SEA @ CHI Assists 2.5 52.3 C 20.9 5 Pending
20 Azura Stevens SEA @ CHI Rebounds 8.5 52.1 C 20.5 5 Pending
21 Azura Stevens SEA @ CHI Points 13.5 51 C 20.9 4 Pending
22 Azura Stevens SEA @ CHI Assists 2.5 49.4 D 20 5 Pending
23 Natisha Hiedeman SEA @ CHI Rebounds 2.5 49 D 10.8 5 Pending
24 Kayla McBride LA @ MIN 3-Pointers Made 2.5 48.6 D 19.9 0 Pending
25 Courtney Williams LA @ MIN Rebounds 5.5 48.2 D 11 5 Pending
Showing 1–25 of 104 picks
← Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next →

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.