📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Sep 21 – Sep 27 →
Wins
14
Losses
19
Push
1
Win %
42.4%
Pending
2
Thu 10/8 Wed 10/7 Tue 10/6 Mon 10/5 Sun 10/4 Sat 10/3 Fri 10/2 Thu 10/1 Wed 9/30 Tue 9/29 Sun 9/27 Sat 9/26 Fri 9/25 Thu 9/24
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
Hits 0.5 OVER
48.4 D
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
55
Clean
21.2
Fit
0
2
Hits 0.5 OVER
47.7 D
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
53
Clean
21.4
Fit
0
3
Hits 0.5 OVER
46.7 D
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
51
Clean
21.2
Fit
0
4
Hits 0.5 OVER
46.6 D
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
52
Clean
20.7
Fit
0

📋 Full Board (858 picks · Page 2/35)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
26 Kyle Teel CWS COL @ CWS Hits 0.5 40.5 D 19.5 0 Pending
27 Michael Busch CHC CHC @ BOS Hits 0.5 40.5 D 19.5 0 Pending
28 Andres Gimenez TOR CIN @ TOR Hits 0.5 40 D 19.4 0 Pending
29 Corbin Carroll ARI ARI @ SD Runs Batted In 0.5 40 D 19.4 0 Pending
30 Ian Happ CHC CHC @ BOS Hits 0.5 40 D 19.4 0 Pending
31 John Rave KC CLE @ KC Hits 0.5 40 D 19.4 0 Pending
32 Michael Massey KC CLE @ KC Hits 0.5 40 D 19.4 0 Pending
33 Miguel Vargas CWS COL @ CWS Runs Batted In 0.5 40 D 19.4 0 Pending
34 Nico Hoerner CHC CHC @ BOS Hits 0.5 40 D 19.4 0 Pending
35 Wade Meckler LAA LAA @ SEA Hits 1.5 40 D 19.4 0 Pending
36 Henry Bolte OAK HOU @ OAK Hits 0.5 39.9 D 18.8 0 Pending
37 Teoscar Hernandez LAD LAD @ SF Hits 0.5 39.5 D 18.3 0 Pending
38 Will Smith LAD LAD @ SF Hits 0.5 39.5 D 18.3 0 Pending
39 Munetaka Murakami CWS COL @ CWS Runs Batted In 0.5 39.4 D 18.8 0 Pending
40 Christian Walker HOU HOU @ OAK Runs Batted In 0.5 37.8 D 18.3 0 Pending
41 Munetaka Murakami CWS COL @ CWS Hits 0.5 37.8 D 18.3 0 Pending
42 Tim Tawa ARI ARI @ SD Hits 0.5 37.8 D 18.3 0 Pending
43 Geraldo Perdomo ARI ARI @ SD Runs Batted In 0.5 36.1 D 17.4 0 Pending
44 Shay Whitcomb SF LAD @ SF Hits 0.5 35.9 D 17.8 0 Pending
45 Geraldo Perdomo ARI ARI @ SD Hits 0.5 35.9 D 18.1 0 Pending
46 Lawrence Butler OAK HOU @ OAK Hits 0.5 35.9 D 18.1 0 Pending
47 Francisco Alvarez NYM NYM @ WSH Hits 0.5 35.6 D 18.3 0 Pending
48 Ceddanne Rafaela BOS CHC @ BOS Hits 0.5 35 D 17.6 0 Pending
49 Kyle Tucker LAD LAD @ SF Hits 0.5 35 D 17.6 0 Pending
50 Tommy Edman LAD LAD @ SF Hits 0.5 35 D 17.6 0 Pending
Showing 26–50 of 858 picks

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.