📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Oct 24 →
Wins
2
Losses
4
Win %
33.3%
Pending
0
Sun 10/25 Sat 10/24 Fri 10/23 Thu 10/22 Wed 10/21 Tue 10/20 Mon 10/19 Sun 10/18 Sat 10/17 Fri 10/16 Thu 10/15 Wed 10/14 Tue 10/13 Mon 10/12
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
GSV @ ATL WNBA
Points 11.5 OVER
79.4 B+
  • Projected edge vs line
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
81
Clean
28.7
Fit
4
2
GSV @ ATL WNBA
Assists 7.5 OVER
69.8 B
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
57
Clean
28.1
Fit
5
4
GSV @ ATL WNBA
Rebounds 4.5 OVER
64.7 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
45
Clean
26.9
Fit
5
7
GSV @ ATL WNBA
Points 18.5 OVER
59.5 C+
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
52
Clean
22.5
Fit
4

📋 Full Board (37 picks · Page 1/2)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
1 Jordin Canada GSV @ ATL Points 11.5 79.4 B+ 28.7 4 Pending
2 Jordin Canada GSV @ ATL Assists 7.5 69.8 B 28.1 5 Pending
4 Jordin Canada GSV @ ATL Rebounds 4.5 64.7 B- 26.9 5 Pending
7 Gabby Williams GSV @ ATL Points 18.5 59.5 C+ 22.5 4 Pending
9 Angel Reese GSV @ ATL Points 16.5 58.5 C+ 17.3 4 Pending
10 Naz Hillmon GSV @ ATL Rebounds 3.5 55.7 C 16.7 5 Pending
11 Gabby Williams GSV @ ATL Assists 2.5 55.1 C 20.7 5 Pending
12 Gabby Williams GSV @ ATL Rebounds 4.5 52.6 C 19.7 5 Pending
13 Kiah Stokes GSV @ ATL Rebounds 7.5 51.3 C 10.8 5 Pending
16 Angel Reese GSV @ ATL Assists 2.5 49.1 D 17.5 5 Pending
20 Jordin Canada GSV @ ATL 3-Pointers Made 1.5 47 D 19.4 0 Pending
21 Rhyne Howard GSV @ ATL Rebounds 4.5 46.8 D 15.6 5 Pending
22 Rhyne Howard GSV @ ATL Points 15.5 46.7 D 16.9 4 Pending
24 Rhyne Howard GSV @ ATL Assists 3.5 45.3 D 14.7 5 Pending
25 Allisha Gray GSV @ ATL Points 16.5 44.8 D 10.7 4 Pending
27 Angel Reese GSV @ ATL Rebounds 11.5 42.8 D 16.5 5 Pending
32 Allisha Gray GSV @ ATL Rebounds 3.5 37.2 D 9.3 5 Pending
39 Naz Hillmon GSV @ ATL Points 5.5 34.9 D 13 4 Pending
40 Gabby Williams GSV @ ATL 3-Pointers Made 2.5 34.3 D 13.2 0 Pending
43 Allisha Gray GSV @ ATL Assists 2.5 29.3 D 6.7 5 Pending
44 Angel Reese GSV @ ATL 3-Pointers Made 0.5 27.4 D 7 0 Pending
48 Kiah Stokes GSV @ ATL Points 3.5 21.3 D 6.4 4 Pending
49 Rhyne Howard GSV @ ATL 3-Pointers Made 2.5 21.2 D 7.8 0 Pending
51 Allisha Gray GSV @ ATL 3-Pointers Made 1.5 19.8 D 1.7 0 Pending
54 Naz Hillmon GSV @ ATL 3-Pointers Made 0.5 17.8 D 5 0 Pending
Showing 1–25 of 37 picks
← Prev 1 2 Next →

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.