Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 951 | MLB | CJ Abrams | WSH vs NYY@WSN | R | 0.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 952 | MLB | CJ Abrams | WSH vs NYY@WSN | TB | 1.5 | +150 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 953 | MLB | Cody Bellinger | NYY vs NYY@WSN | R | 0.5 | -105 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 954 | MLB | Cody Bellinger | NYY vs NYY@WSN | TB | 1.5 | +105 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 955 | MLB | Cole Carrigg | COL vs COL@SFG | R | 0.5 | +130 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 956 | MLB | Cole Carrigg | COL vs COL@SFG | TB | 1.5 | +146 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 957 | MLB | Cole Young | SEA vs SEA@TBR | R | 0.5 | +175 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 958 | MLB | Cole Young | SEA vs SEA@TBR | TB | 1.5 | +170 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 959 | MLB | Colson Montgomery | CWS vs ATHLETICS@ | R | 0.5 | +105 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 960 | MLB | Colson Montgomery | CWS vs ATHLETICS@ | TB | 1.5 | +130 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 961 | MLB | Colt Emerson | SEA vs SEA@TBR | R | 0.5 | +180 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 962 | MLB | Colt Emerson | SEA vs SEA@TBR | TB | 1.5 | +220 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 963 | MLB | Colt Keith | DET vs PHI@DET | R | 0.5 | +120 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 964 | MLB | Colt Keith | DET vs PHI@DET | TB | 1.5 | +130 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 965 | MLB | Colton Cowser | BAL vs KCR@BAL | R | 0.5 | +120 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 966 | MLB | Colton Cowser | BAL vs KCR@BAL | TB | 1.5 | +175 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 967 | MLB | Cooper Pratt | MIL vs MIL@PIT | R | 0.5 | +180 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 968 | MLB | Cooper Pratt | MIL vs MIL@PIT | TB | 1.5 | +200 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 969 | MLB | Corbin Carroll | AZ vs ARI@LAD | R | 0.5 | +140 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 970 | MLB | Corbin Carroll | AZ vs ARI@LAD | TB | 1.5 | +140 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 971 | MLB | Curtis Mead | WSH vs NYY@WSN | R | 0.5 | +110 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 972 | MLB | Curtis Mead | WSH vs NYY@WSN | TB | 1.5 | +120 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 973 | MLB | Dalton Rushing | LAD vs ARI@LAD | R | 0.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 974 | MLB | Dalton Rushing | LAD vs ARI@LAD | TB | 1.5 | +165 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 975 | MLB | Daniel Schneemann | CLE vs CLE@MIA | R | 0.5 | +165 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 976 | MLB | Daniel Schneemann | CLE vs CLE@MIA | TB | 1.5 | +190 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 977 | MLB | Dansby Swanson | CHC vs CHC@CIN | R | 0.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 978 | MLB | Dansby Swanson | CHC vs CHC@CIN | TB | 1.5 | +150 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 979 | MLB | Daulton Varsho | TOR vs TOR@SDP | R | 0.5 | +180 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 980 | MLB | Daulton Varsho | TOR vs TOR@SDP | TB | 1.5 | +180 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 981 | MLB | Daylen Lile | WSH vs NYY@WSN | R | 0.5 | +145 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 982 | MLB | Daylen Lile | WSH vs NYY@WSN | TB | 1.5 | +143 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 983 | MLB | Denzer Guzman | LAA vs LAA@MIN | R | 0.5 | +170 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 984 | MLB | Denzer Guzman | LAA vs LAA@MIN | TB | 1.5 | +155 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 985 | MLB | Dillon Dingler | DET vs PHI@DET | R | 0.5 | +110 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 986 | MLB | Dillon Dingler | DET vs PHI@DET | TB | 1.5 | +110 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 987 | MLB | Dominic Canzone | SEA vs SEA@TBR | R | 0.5 | +120 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 988 | MLB | Dominic Canzone | SEA vs SEA@TBR | TB | 1.5 | +120 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 989 | MLB | Dominic Smith | ATL vs ATL@STL | R | 0.5 | +165 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 990 | MLB | Dominic Smith | ATL vs ATL@STL | TB | 1.5 | +155 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 991 | MLB | Drake Baldwin | ATL vs ATL@STL | R | 0.5 | +120 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 992 | MLB | Drake Baldwin | ATL vs ATL@STL | TB | 1.5 | +120 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 993 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh | SF vs COL@SFG | R | 0.5 | +165 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 994 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh | SF vs COL@SFG | TB | 1.5 | +185 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 995 | MLB | Dylan Beavers | BAL vs KCR@BAL | R | 0.5 | +130 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 996 | MLB | Dylan Beavers | BAL vs KCR@BAL | TB | 1.5 | +165 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 997 | MLB | Dylan Crews | WSH vs NYY@WSN | R | 0.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 998 | MLB | Dylan Crews | WSH vs NYY@WSN | TB | 1.5 | +130 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 999 | MLB | Eddy Alvarez | vs BOS@NYM | H | 0.5 | -140 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1000 | MLB | Eddy Alvarez | vs BOS@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +450 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.