Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 551 | MLB | Denzer Guzman 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | H | 1.5 | +450 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 552 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh 10 games | SF vs SFG@SEA | R | 0.5 | +230 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 553 | MLB | Eli White 10 games | ATL vs TEX@ATL | R | 0.5 | +170 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 554 | MLB | Eli White 10 games | ATL vs TEX@ATL | RBI | 0.5 | +270 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 555 | MLB | Elly De La Cruz 10 games | CIN vs CIN@COL | HR | 0.5 | +280 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 556 | MLB | Elly De La Cruz 10 games | CIN vs CIN@COL | RBI | 0.5 | +105 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 557 | MLB | Enmanuel Valdez 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.5 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 558 | MLB | Enmanuel Valdez 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 559 | MLB | Ernie Clement 10 games | TOR vs CHW@TOR | H | 1.5 | +180 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 560 | MLB | Esmerlyn Valdez 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | HR | 0.5 | +350 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.5 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 561 | MLB | Esteury Ruiz 10 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | R | 0.5 | +160 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 562 | MLB | Evan Carter 10 games | TEX vs TEX@ATL | TB | 1.5 | +190 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 563 | MLB | Francisco Lindor 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 564 | MLB | Gabriel Arias 10 games | CLE vs PIT@CLE | R | 0.5 | +180 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 565 | MLB | Garrett Mitchell 10 games | MIL vs MIA@MIL | H | 1.5 | +360 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 566 | MLB | Garrett Mitchell 10 games | MIL vs MIA@MIL | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.5 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 567 | MLB | Garrett Mitchell 10 games | MIL vs MIA@MIL | RBI | 0.5 | +210 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 568 | MLB | Gavin Sheets 10 games | SD vs SDP@KCR | R | 0.5 | +100 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 569 | MLB | George Springer 10 games | TOR vs CHW@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 570 | MLB | Geraldo Perdomo 10 games | AZ vs STL@ARI | RBI | 0.5 | +214 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 571 | MLB | Heliot Ramos 10 games | SF vs SFG@SEA | H | 1.5 | +280 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 572 | MLB | Henry Bolte 10 games | ATH vs WSN@Athlet | RBI | 0.5 | +170 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 573 | MLB | Henry Davis 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 574 | MLB | Ian Happ 10 games | CHC vs MIN@CHC | TB | 1.5 | +155 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 575 | MLB | Isaac Paredes 10 games | HOU vs BAL@HOU | H | 1.5 | +300 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 576 | MLB | Ivan Herrera 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | R | 0.5 | +100 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 577 | MLB | J.P. Crawford 10 games | SEA vs SFG@SEA | H | 1.5 | +300 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 578 | MLB | J.P. Crawford 10 games | SEA vs SFG@SEA | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 579 | MLB | Jac Caglianone 10 games | KC vs SDP@KCR | R | 0.5 | +100 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 580 | MLB | Jac Caglianone 10 games | KC vs SDP@KCR | RBI | 0.5 | +135 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.5 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 581 | MLB | Jackson Chourio 10 games | MIL vs MIA@MIL | H | 1.5 | +220 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 582 | MLB | Jackson Chourio 10 games | MIL vs MIA@MIL | R | 1.5 | +600 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 583 | MLB | Jackson Chourio 10 games | MIL vs MIA@MIL | TB | 1.5 | +125 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 584 | MLB | Jackson Merrill 10 games | SD vs SDP@KCR | R | 0.5 | -125 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 585 | MLB | Jacob Wilson 10 games | ATH vs WSN@Athlet | R | 0.5 | +105 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 586 | MLB | Jacob Young 10 games | WSH vs WSN@Athlet | RBI | 0.5 | +226 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 587 | MLB | Jake Cronenworth 10 games | SD vs SDP@KCR | R | 0.5 | +105 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 588 | MLB | Jake Cronenworth 10 games | SD vs SDP@KCR | RBI | 0.5 | +178 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 589 | MLB | Jake Cronenworth 10 games | SD vs SDP@KCR | TB | 1.5 | +138 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 590 | MLB | Jake Mangum 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 591 | MLB | Jake McCarthy 10 games | COL vs CIN@COL | RBI | 0.5 | +173 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 592 | MLB | James Outman 10 games | DET vs DET@LAA | H | 0.5 | +108 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 593 | MLB | James Outman 10 games | DET vs DET@LAA | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 594 | MLB | Jared Triolo 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | H | 0.5 | -135 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 595 | MLB | Jared Triolo 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | R | 0.5 | +200 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 596 | MLB | Javier Sanoja 10 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | TB | 1.5 | +150 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 597 | MLB | Jazz Chisholm Jr. 10 games | NYY vs LAD@NYY | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 598 | MLB | JJ Bleday 10 games | CIN vs CIN@COL | HR | 0.5 | +350 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 599 | MLB | JJ Wetherholt 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | H | 1.5 | +190 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 600 | MLB | Joey Ortiz 10 games | MIL vs MIA@MIL | R | 0.5 | +190 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.