Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1051 | MLB | Josh Lowe 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | H | 1.5 | +500 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1052 | MLB | Josh Lowe 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1053 | MLB | Josh Naylor 10 games | SEA vs SFG@SEA | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1054 | MLB | Jung Hoo Lee 10 games | SF vs SFG@SEA | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1055 | MLB | Keibert Ruiz 10 games | WSH vs WSN@ATHLET | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1056 | MLB | Kerry Carpenter 10 games | DET vs DET@LAA | H | 1.5 | +300 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1057 | MLB | Kerry Carpenter 10 games | DET vs DET@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1058 | MLB | Ketel Marte 10 games | AZ vs STL@ARI | H | 1.5 | +190 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1059 | MLB | Ketel Marte 10 games | AZ vs STL@ARI | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1060 | MLB | Kyle Manzardo 10 games | CLE vs PIT@CLE | H | 1.5 | +380 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.4 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1061 | MLB | Kyle Manzardo 10 games | CLE vs PIT@CLE | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1062 | MLB | Lawrence Butler 10 games | OAK vs WSN@ATHLET | H | 1.5 | +260 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1063 | MLB | Lawrence Butler 10 games | OAK vs WSN@ATHLET | RBI | 1.5 | +500 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1064 | MLB | Liam Hicks 10 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1065 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | H | 1.5 | +475 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1066 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1067 | MLB | Lourdes Gurriel Jr. 10 games | AZ vs STL@ARI | H | 1.5 | +280 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1068 | MLB | Lourdes Gurriel Jr. 10 games | AZ vs STL@ARI | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1069 | MLB | Luis Arraez 10 games | SF vs SFG@SEA | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1070 | MLB | Luke Keaschall 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CHC | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1071 | MLB | Luke Raley 10 games | SEA vs SFG@SEA | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1072 | MLB | Masyn Winn 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | H | 1.5 | +240 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1073 | MLB | Matt Vierling 10 games | DET vs DET@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1074 | MLB | Michael Busch 10 games | CHC vs MIN@CHC | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.4 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1075 | MLB | Michael Conforto 10 games | CHC vs MIN@CHC | H | 1.5 | +450 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1076 | MLB | Munetaka Murakami 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TOR | H | 1.5 | +280 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1077 | MLB | Nasim Nunez 10 games | WSH vs WSN@ATHLET | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1078 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | H | 1.5 | +300 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1079 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1080 | MLB | Nathan Lukes 10 games | TOR vs CHW@TOR | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1081 | MLB | Nico Hoerner 10 games | CHC vs MIN@CHC | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1082 | MLB | Oswald Peraza 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | H | 1.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1083 | MLB | Oswald Peraza 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1084 | MLB | Otto Lopez 10 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | RBI | 0.5 | +204 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 26 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1085 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 10 games | CHC vs MIN@CHC | H | 1.5 | +230 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1086 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 10 games | CHC vs MIN@CHC | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1087 | MLB | Rhys Hoskins 10 games | CLE vs PIT@CLE | H | 1.5 | +475 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1088 | MLB | Rhys Hoskins 10 games | CLE vs PIT@CLE | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1089 | MLB | Riley Greene 10 games | DET vs DET@LAA | RBI | 0.5 | +130 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 26 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1090 | MLB | Ryan Kreidler 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CHC | H | 1.5 | +400 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1091 | MLB | Ryan Kreidler 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CHC | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1092 | MLB | Ryan Waldschmidt 10 games | AZ vs STL@ARI | H | 1.5 | +450 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1093 | MLB | Ryan Waldschmidt 10 games | AZ vs STL@ARI | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1094 | MLB | Shea Langeliers 10 games | OAK vs WSN@ATHLET | RBI | 1.5 | +300 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.3 | 26 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1095 | MLB | Spencer Torkelson 10 games | DET vs DET@LAA | H | 1.5 | +340 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1096 | MLB | Travis Bazzana 10 games | AL vs PIT@CLE | H | 1.5 | +300 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1097 | MLB | Travis Bazzana 10 games | AL vs PIT@CLE | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1098 | MLB | Trea Turner 10 games | PHI vs NYM@PHI | H | 1.5 | +180 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1099 | MLB | Victor Robles 10 games | SEA vs SFG@SEA | H | 1.5 | +400 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1100 | MLB | Victor Robles 10 games | SEA vs SFG@SEA | RBI | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.