Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1051 | MLB | Eury Perez | MIA vs NYM | K | 5.5 | -113 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1052 | MLB | Eury Perez | MIA vs NYM | Outs | 16.5 | -111 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1053 | MLB | Fernando Tatis Jr. | SD vs WSH | R | 0.5 | -123 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1054 | MLB | Fernando Tatis Jr. | SD vs WSH | TB | 1.5 | +100 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1055 | MLB | Francisco Alvarez | MIA vs NYM | R | 0.5 | +156 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1056 | MLB | Francisco Alvarez | MIA vs NYM | TB | 0.5 | -120 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1057 | MLB | Francisco Alvarez | MIA vs NYM | TB | 1.5 | +175 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1058 | MLB | Francisco Lindor | MIA vs NYM | R | 0.5 | +101 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1059 | MLB | Francisco Lindor | MIA vs NYM | TB | 1.5 | +134 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1060 | MLB | Freddie Freeman | LAD vs CIN | R | 0.5 | +102 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1061 | MLB | Freddie Freeman | LAD vs CIN | TB | 1.5 | +143 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1062 | MLB | Freddy Fermin | SD vs WSH | R | 0.5 | +178 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1063 | MLB | Freddy Fermin | SD vs WSH | TB | 0.5 | -149 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1064 | MLB | Gabriel Moreno | KC vs ARI | R | 0.5 | +114 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1065 | MLB | Gabriel Moreno | KC vs ARI | TB | 1.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1066 | MLB | Garrett Mitchell | MIL vs CHC | R | 0.5 | +153 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1067 | MLB | Garrett Mitchell | MIL vs CHC | TB | 0.5 | -164 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1068 | MLB | Gary Sanchez | MIL vs CHC | TB | 0.5 | -123 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1069 | MLB | George Springer | OAK vs TOR | R | 0.5 | -124 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1070 | MLB | George Springer | OAK vs TOR | TB | 1.5 | +117 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1071 | MLB | Geraldo Perdomo | KC vs ARI | R | 0.5 | -114 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1072 | MLB | Geraldo Perdomo | KC vs ARI | TB | 1.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1073 | MLB | Gleyber Torres | DET vs MIN | R | 0.5 | +138 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1074 | MLB | Gleyber Torres | DET vs MIN | TB | 1.5 | +164 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1075 | MLB | Graham Pauley | MIA vs NYM | R | 0.5 | +205 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1076 | MLB | Graham Pauley | MIA vs NYM | TB | 0.5 | -120 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1077 | MLB | Graham Pauley | MIA vs NYM | TB | 1.5 | +225 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1078 | MLB | Grant Holmes | PHI vs ATL | K | 3.5 | +104 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1079 | MLB | Grant Holmes | PHI vs ATL | Outs | 14.5 | -132 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1080 | MLB | Grayson Rodriguez | BOS vs LAA | K | 4.5 | -103 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1081 | MLB | Grayson Rodriguez | BOS vs LAA | Outs | 15.5 | -105 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1082 | MLB | Griffin Conine | MIA vs NYM | R | 0.5 | +120 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1083 | MLB | Griffin Conine | MIA vs NYM | TB | 0.5 | -162 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1084 | MLB | Griffin Conine | MIA vs NYM | TB | 1.5 | +135 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1085 | MLB | Gunnar Henderson | BAL vs CLE | R | 0.5 | +141 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1086 | MLB | Gunnar Henderson | BAL vs CLE | TB | 1.5 | +158 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1087 | MLB | Ha-Seong Kim | PHI vs ATL | R | 0.5 | +231 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1088 | MLB | Ha-Seong Kim | PHI vs ATL | TB | 0.5 | -105 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1089 | MLB | Ha-Seong Kim | PHI vs ATL | TB | 1.5 | +275 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1090 | MLB | Hao-Yu Lee | DET vs MIN | TB | 0.5 | -169 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1091 | MLB | Hector Rodriguez | LAD vs CIN | R | 0.5 | +126 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1092 | MLB | Hector Rodriguez | LAD vs CIN | TB | 0.5 | -172 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1093 | MLB | Hector Rodriguez | LAD vs CIN | TB | 1.5 | +180 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1094 | MLB | Henry Bolte | OAK vs TOR | R | 0.5 | +155 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1095 | MLB | Henry Bolte | OAK vs TOR | TB | 0.5 | -159 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1096 | MLB | Heriberto Hernandez | MIA vs NYM | R | 0.5 | +106 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1097 | MLB | Heriberto Hernandez | MIA vs NYM | TB | 1.5 | +149 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1098 | MLB | Ildemaro Vargas | KC vs ARI | R | 0.5 | +138 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1099 | MLB | Ildemaro Vargas | KC vs ARI | TB | 1.5 | +138 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1100 | MLB | Isaac Collins | KC vs ARI | TB | 0.5 | -161 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.