Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 501 | MLB | Andres Gimenez 10 games | TOR vs DET@TOR | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 502 | MLB | Andrew Knizner 10 games | SF vs SFG@STL | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 503 | MLB | Andrew Knizner 10 games | SF vs SFG@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +264 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 504 | MLB | Angel Martinez 10 games | CLE vs CHW@CLE | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 505 | MLB | Anthony Volpe 10 games | NYY vs NYY@MIN | H | 1.5 | +380 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 506 | MLB | Anthony Volpe 10 games | NYY vs NYY@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 507 | MLB | Austin Riley 10 games | ATL vs ATL@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 508 | MLB | Austin Wells 10 games | NYY vs NYY@MIN | H | 0.5 | +105 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 509 | MLB | Austin Wells 10 games | NYY vs NYY@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 510 | MLB | Austin Wells 10 games | NYY vs NYY@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +275 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 511 | MLB | Ben Rice 10 games | NYY vs NYY@MIN | H | 1.5 | +220 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 512 | MLB | Brayan Rocchio 10 games | CLE vs CHW@CLE | H | 1.5 | +400 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +-0 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 513 | MLB | Brett Bateman 10 games | TOR vs DET@TOR | H | 1.5 | +230 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 514 | MLB | Brett Baty 10 games | NYM vs BAL@NYM | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 515 | MLB | Brett Callahan 10 games | DET vs DET@TOR | RBI | 0.5 | +319 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 516 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs NYY@MIN | H | 1.5 | +240 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 517 | MLB | Bryan Torres 10 games | STL vs SFG@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +280 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 518 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge 10 games | SF vs SFG@STL | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 519 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge 10 games | SF vs SFG@STL | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 520 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAA | RBI | 0.5 | +180 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 521 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs BAL@NYM | H | 1.5 | +280 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 522 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs BAL@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 523 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs BAL@NYM | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 524 | MLB | Carson Kelly 10 games | CHC vs ATL@CHC | H | 1.5 | +360 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 525 | MLB | Chase DeLauter 10 games | CLE vs CHW@CLE | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 526 | MLB | Chase DeLauter 10 games | CLE vs CHW@CLE | RBI | 0.5 | +216 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 527 | MLB | Chase Meidroth 10 games | CWS vs CHW@CLE | H | 1.5 | +400 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 528 | MLB | Chase Meidroth 10 games | CWS vs CHW@CLE | HR | 0.5 | +1400 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 529 | MLB | Christian Encarnacion-Strand 10 games | BAL vs BAL@NYM | H | 1.5 | +340 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 530 | MLB | Christian Encarnacion-Strand 10 games | BAL vs BAL@NYM | RBI | 0.5 | +211 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 531 | MLB | Christian Koss 10 games | SF vs SFG@STL | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 532 | MLB | Cole Carrigg 10 games | COL vs SDP@COL | H | 1.5 | +220 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 533 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAA | H | 1.5 | +320 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 534 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 535 | MLB | Colson Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs CHW@CLE | H | 0.5 | +135 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 536 | MLB | Colson Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs CHW@CLE | RBI | 0.5 | +275 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 537 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs DET@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 538 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs DET@TOR | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 539 | MLB | Colton Cowser 10 games | BAL vs BAL@NYM | RBI | 0.5 | +297 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 540 | MLB | Corbin Carroll 10 games | AZ vs MIA@ARI | H | 1.5 | +260 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 541 | MLB | Corbin Carroll 10 games | AZ vs MIA@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 542 | MLB | Denzer Guzman 10 games | LAA vs SEA@LAA | H | 1.5 | +360 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 543 | MLB | Denzer Guzman 10 games | LAA vs SEA@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 544 | MLB | Dillon Dingler 10 games | DET vs DET@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 545 | MLB | Dominic Canzone 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 546 | MLB | Dominic Canzone 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 547 | MLB | Drake Baldwin 10 games | ATL vs ATL@CHC | H | 1.5 | +220 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 548 | MLB | Drake Baldwin 10 games | ATL vs ATL@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 549 | MLB | Dylan Beavers 10 games | BAL vs BAL@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 550 | MLB | Enrique Hernandez 10 games | LAD vs LAD@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.