Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 601 | MLB | CJ Abrams 10 games | WSH vs PHI@WSN | RBI | 0.5 | +262 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 602 | MLB | Cole Carrigg 10 games | COL vs SDP@COL | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 603 | MLB | Cole Carrigg 10 games | COL vs SDP@COL | RBI | 0.5 | +180 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 604 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAA | H | 1.5 | +260 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 605 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 606 | MLB | Colson Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs CHW@CLE | RBI | 0.5 | +192 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 607 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs DET@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 608 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs DET@TOR | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 609 | MLB | Connor Norby 10 games | COL vs SDP@COL | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 610 | MLB | Connor Norby 10 games | COL vs SDP@COL | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 611 | MLB | Cooper Pratt 10 games | MIL vs MIL@PIT | RBI | 0.5 | +230 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 612 | MLB | Corbin Carroll 10 games | AZ vs MIA@ARI | H | 1.5 | +230 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 613 | MLB | Corey Seager 10 games | TEX vs BOS@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 614 | MLB | Danny Jansen 10 games | TEX vs BOS@TEX | H | 1.5 | +550 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 615 | MLB | Danny Jansen 10 games | TEX vs BOS@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 616 | MLB | Danny Jansen 10 games | TEX vs BOS@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 617 | MLB | Dillon Dingler 10 games | DET vs DET@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 618 | MLB | Dominic Canzone 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 619 | MLB | Dominic Canzone 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +450 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 620 | MLB | Donovan Walton 10 games | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 621 | MLB | Drake Baldwin 10 games | ATL vs ATL@CHC | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 622 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh 10 games | SF vs SFG@STL | H | 0.5 | -122 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 623 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh 10 games | SF vs SFG@STL | HR | 0.5 | +1300 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 624 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh 10 games | SF vs SFG@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +304 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 625 | MLB | Drew Gilbert 10 games | SF vs SFG@STL | H | 1.5 | +280 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 626 | MLB | Drew Gilbert 10 games | SF vs SFG@STL | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 627 | MLB | Drew Gilbert 10 games | SF vs SFG@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +289 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 628 | MLB | Dylan Crews 10 games | WSH vs PHI@WSN | H | 1.5 | +280 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 629 | MLB | Edgar Quero 10 games | CWS vs CHW@CLE | RBI | 0.5 | +256 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 630 | MLB | Ernie Clement 10 games | TOR vs DET@TOR | RBI | 0.5 | +223 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 631 | MLB | Ezequiel Duran 10 games | TEX vs BOS@TEX | RBI | 0.5 | +267 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 632 | MLB | Ezequiel Tovar 10 games | COL vs SDP@COL | H | 1.5 | +340 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 633 | MLB | Ezequiel Tovar 10 games | COL vs SDP@COL | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 634 | MLB | Ezequiel Tovar 10 games | COL vs SDP@COL | RBI | 0.5 | +207 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 635 | MLB | Francisco Alvarez 10 games | NYM vs BAL@NYM | RBI | 0.5 | +250 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 636 | MLB | Francisco Lindor 10 games | NYM vs BAL@NYM | H | 1.5 | +260 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 637 | MLB | Gabriel Moreno 10 games | AZ vs MIA@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 638 | MLB | Gabriel Moreno 10 games | AZ vs MIA@ARI | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 639 | MLB | George Lombard Jr. 10 games | NYY vs NYY@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 640 | MLB | George Lombard Jr. 10 games | NYY vs NYY@MIN | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 641 | MLB | George Springer 10 games | TOR vs DET@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 642 | MLB | Gleyber Torres 10 games | DET vs DET@TOR | RBI | 0.5 | +206 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 643 | MLB | Griffin Conine 10 games | MIA vs MIA@ARI | RBI | 0.5 | +186 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 644 | MLB | Gunnar Henderson 10 games | BAL vs BAL@NYM | H | 1.5 | +320 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 645 | MLB | Gunnar Henderson 10 games | BAL vs BAL@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 646 | MLB | Gunnar Henderson 10 games | BAL vs BAL@NYM | RBI | 0.5 | +231 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 647 | MLB | Hao-Yu Lee 10 games | DET vs DET@TOR | H | 1.5 | +320 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 648 | MLB | Harry Ford 10 games | WSH vs PHI@WSN | RBI | 0.5 | +349 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 649 | MLB | Henry Bolte 10 games | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | H | 1.5 | +280 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 650 | MLB | Henry Bolte 10 games | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.