Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1451 | MLB | Bryan Torres | STL vs SFG@STL | R | 1.5 | +700 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1452 | MLB | Bryan Torres | STL vs SFG@STL | TB | 1.5 | +148 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1453 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge | SF vs SFG@STL | R | 0.5 | +130 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1454 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge | SF vs SFG@STL | R | 1.5 | +900 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1455 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge | SF vs SFG@STL | TB | 1.5 | +145 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1456 | MLB | Bryce Harper | PHI vs PHI@WSN | R | 0.5 | +105 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1457 | MLB | Bryce Harper | PHI vs PHI@WSN | R | 1.5 | +600 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1458 | MLB | Bryce Harper | PHI vs PHI@WSN | TB | 1.5 | +135 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1459 | MLB | Bryson Stott | PHI vs PHI@WSN | R | 0.5 | +135 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1460 | MLB | Bryson Stott | PHI vs PHI@WSN | R | 1.5 | +900 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1461 | MLB | Bryson Stott | PHI vs PHI@WSN | TB | 1.5 | +175 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1462 | MLB | Cal Raleigh | SEA vs SEA@LAA | R | 0.5 | -105 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1463 | MLB | Cal Raleigh | SEA vs SEA@LAA | R | 1.5 | +550 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1464 | MLB | Cal Raleigh | SEA vs SEA@LAA | TB | 1.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1465 | MLB | Caleb Durbin | BOS vs BOS@TEX | R | 0.5 | +173 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1466 | MLB | Caleb Durbin | BOS vs BOS@TEX | R | 1.5 | +1300 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1467 | MLB | Caleb Durbin | BOS vs BOS@TEX | TB | 1.5 | +170 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1468 | MLB | Cam Smith | HOU vs KCR@HOU | R | 0.5 | +165 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1469 | MLB | Cam Smith | HOU vs KCR@HOU | R | 1.5 | +1300 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1470 | MLB | Cam Smith | HOU vs KCR@HOU | TB | 1.5 | +180 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1471 | MLB | Carlos Cortes | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | R | 0.5 | +234 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1472 | MLB | Carlos Cortes | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | R | 1.5 | +1500 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1473 | MLB | Carlos Cortes | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | TB | 1.5 | +230 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1474 | MLB | Carlos Jorge | CIN vs LAD@CIN | R | 0.5 | +260 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1475 | MLB | Carlos Jorge | CIN vs LAD@CIN | R | 1.5 | +2000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1476 | MLB | Carlos Jorge | CIN vs LAD@CIN | TB | 1.5 | +230 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1477 | MLB | Carlos Narvaez | BAL vs BAL@NYM | R | 0.5 | +225 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1478 | MLB | Carlos Narvaez | BAL vs BAL@NYM | R | 1.5 | +2000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1479 | MLB | Carlos Narvaez | BAL vs BAL@NYM | TB | 1.5 | +260 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1480 | MLB | Carson Benge | NYM vs BAL@NYM | R | 0.5 | +140 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1481 | MLB | Carson Benge | NYM vs BAL@NYM | R | 1.5 | +1000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1482 | MLB | Carson Benge | NYM vs BAL@NYM | TB | 1.5 | +155 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1483 | MLB | Carson Kelly | CHC vs ATL@CHC | R | 0.5 | +140 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1484 | MLB | Carson Kelly | CHC vs ATL@CHC | R | 1.5 | +1000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1485 | MLB | Carson Kelly | CHC vs ATL@CHC | TB | 1.5 | +180 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1486 | MLB | Carter Jensen | KC vs KCR@HOU | R | 0.5 | +115 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1487 | MLB | Carter Jensen | KC vs KCR@HOU | R | 1.5 | +700 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1488 | MLB | Carter Jensen | KC vs KCR@HOU | TB | 1.5 | +150 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1489 | MLB | Cedric Mullins | TB vs ATHLETICS@ | R | 0.5 | +150 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1490 | MLB | Cedric Mullins | TB vs ATHLETICS@ | R | 1.5 | +1000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1491 | MLB | Cedric Mullins | TB vs ATHLETICS@ | TB | 1.5 | +195 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1492 | MLB | Chandler Simpson | TB vs ATHLETICS@ | R | 0.5 | +155 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1493 | MLB | Chandler Simpson | TB vs ATHLETICS@ | R | 1.5 | +1000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1494 | MLB | Chandler Simpson | TB vs ATHLETICS@ | TB | 1.5 | +150 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1495 | MLB | Chase DeLauter | CLE vs CHW@CLE | R | 0.5 | -105 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1496 | MLB | Chase DeLauter | CLE vs CHW@CLE | R | 1.5 | +550 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1497 | MLB | Chase DeLauter | CLE vs CHW@CLE | TB | 1.5 | +110 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1498 | MLB | Chase Meidroth | CWS vs CHW@CLE | R | 0.5 | +120 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1499 | MLB | Chase Meidroth | CWS vs CHW@CLE | R | 1.5 | +800 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1500 | MLB | Chase Meidroth | CWS vs CHW@CLE | TB | 1.5 | +140 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.