📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← May 10 →
Wins
2
Losses
4
Win %
33.3%
Pending
0
Mon 11/2 Sun 11/1 Sat 10/31 Fri 10/30 Thu 10/29 Wed 10/28 Tue 10/27 Mon 10/26 Sun 10/25 Sat 10/24 Fri 10/23 Thu 10/22 Wed 10/21 Tue 10/20
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
Points 4.5 OVER
40.5 D
  • Projected edge vs line
  • Stable player role
Raw
84
Clean
11.5
Fit
-5
2
MIN MIN @ SAS NBA
ML -110 ML
36.3 D
Raw
16
Clean
6.3
Fit
8
5
Rebounds 5.5 OVER
23.5 D
  • Stable player role
Raw
52
Clean
10.8
Fit
-5
6
Assists 3.5 OVER
20.9 D
Raw
64
Clean
0.9
Fit
-5

📋 Full Board (40 picks · Page 1/2)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
1 Julian Champagnie SAS MIN @ SAS Points 4.5 40.5 D 11.5 -5 Pending
2 MIN MIN MIN @ SAS ML -110 36.3 D 6.3 8 Pending
5 Julian Champagnie SAS MIN @ SAS Rebounds 5.5 23.5 D 10.8 -5 Pending
6 Stephon Castle SAS MIN @ SAS Assists 3.5 20.9 D 0.9 -5 Pending
7 De'Aaron Fox SAS MIN @ SAS Assists 3.5 19.4 D 1.7 -5 Pending
8 Devin Vassell SAS MIN @ SAS Rebounds 1.5 19.4 D 1.5 -5 Pending
9 Jaden McDaniels MIN MIN @ SAS Points 14.5 15.9 D 1.7 -5 Pending
10 Dylan Harper SAS MIN @ SAS Rebounds 4.5 15.7 D 10.6 -5 Pending
11 Julius Randle MIN MIN @ SAS Points 16.5 13.8 D 2.2 -5 Pending
17 Julian Champagnie SAS MIN @ SAS 3-Pointers Made 0.5 11.9 D 3.7 -6 Pending
20 Jaden McDaniels MIN MIN @ SAS Rebounds 5.5 10.4 D 1.3 -5 Pending
21 Devin Vassell SAS MIN @ SAS Assists 3.5 10.2 D 2.7 -5 Pending
22 Devin Vassell SAS MIN @ SAS Points 13.5 9.4 D 3.1 -5 Pending
23 Julius Randle MIN MIN @ SAS Rebounds 8.5 9.3 D 2.1 -5 Pending
25 Dylan Harper SAS MIN @ SAS Points 20.5 9.1 D 10.2 -5 Pending
33 Rudy Gobert MIN MIN @ SAS Points 7.5 6.1 D 1 -5 Pending
45 Rudy Gobert MIN MIN @ SAS Rebounds 12.5 5.1 D 2.4 -5 Pending
47 De'Aaron Fox SAS MIN @ SAS Points 26.5 5 D 2.1 -5 Pending
65 Stephon Castle SAS MIN @ SAS Points 23.5 3 D 2.5 -5 Pending
66 De'Aaron Fox SAS MIN @ SAS Rebounds 4.5 2.4 D 0.3 -5 Pending
75 Julius Randle MIN MIN @ SAS Assists 3.5 0.7 D -0.3 -5 Pending
78 De'Aaron Fox SAS MIN @ SAS 3-Pointers Made 1.5 0 D -8.3 -6 Pending
79 Jaden McDaniels MIN MIN @ SAS 3-Pointers Made 0.5 0 D -9.9 -6 Pending
80 Luke Kornet SAS MIN @ SAS Assists 1.5 0 D -3.8 -5 Pending
81 Luke Kornet SAS MIN @ SAS Points 7.5 0 D -0.3 -5 Pending
Showing 1–25 of 40 picks
← Prev 1 2 Next →

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.