📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Oct 26 →
Wins
3
Losses
3
Win %
50%
Pending
0
Tue 10/27 Mon 10/26 Sun 10/25 Sat 10/24 Fri 10/23 Thu 10/22 Wed 10/21 Tue 10/20 Mon 10/19 Sun 10/18 Sat 10/17 Fri 10/16 Thu 10/15 Wed 10/14
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
8
Rebounds 9.5 OVER
56.9 C
  • Heavy minutes projection
Raw
49
Clean
15.9
Fit
5
10
MIA DAL @ PHI NBA
ML -110 ML
54.4 C
  • Strong injury edge
Raw
45
Clean
10.6
Fit
8
13
Assists 4.5 OVER
51.6 C
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Higher volatility than ideal
Raw
46
Clean
13.9
Fit
5
15
Assists 4.5 OVER
50.9 C
  • Heavy minutes projection
Raw
42
Clean
15.3
Fit
5

📋 Full Board (385 picks · Page 1/16)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
8 Alperen Sengun HOU ATL @ GSV Rebounds 9.5 56.9 C 15.9 5 Pending
10 MIA MIA DAL @ PHI ML -110 54.4 C 10.6 8 Pending
13 Alperen Sengun HOU ATL @ GSV Assists 4.5 51.6 C 13.9 5 Pending
15 Amen Thompson HOU ATL @ GSV Assists 4.5 50.9 C 15.3 5 Pending
18 Derrick White BOS CHI @ BOS Rebounds 3.5 48.6 D 13.5 5 Pending
20 Amen Thompson HOU ATL @ GSV Points 17.5 47.3 D 16 4 Pending
21 Amen Thompson HOU ATL @ GSV Rebounds 8.5 47.3 D 16.6 5 Pending
22 Alperen Sengun HOU ATL @ GSV Points 20.5 46.4 D 15.7 4 Pending
23 DEN DEN DEN @ GSW ML -110 45.7 D 6.7 8 Pending
27 MIN MIN MIN @ CLE ML -110 40.4 D 6.5 8 Pending
28 Derrick White BOS CHI @ BOS Points 16.5 39.5 D 13.8 4 Pending
29 UTA UTA UTA @ MEM ML -110 39.2 D 5.7 8 Pending
33 Derrick White BOS CHI @ BOS Assists 5.5 37.5 D 14.9 5 Pending
35 ATL ATL ATL @ HOU ML -110 36.5 D 6 8 Pending
37 CHI CHI CHI @ BOS ML -110 34.9 D 6.1 8 Pending
39 WAS WSH WSH @ CHA ML -110 33.4 D 6.5 8 Pending
42 OKC OKC OKC @ PHX ML -110 32.6 D 5.4 8 Pending
44 IND IND MIL @ IND ML -110 30.6 D 5.7 8 Pending
46 Leonard Miller CHI CHI @ BOS Points 9.5 25.2 D 1.7 -5 Pending
48 Max Christie DAL MIA @ DAL Points 11.5 22.3 D 1.5 -5 Pending
49 Onyeka Okongwu ATL ATL @ HOU Assists 2.5 21.5 D 0.6 -5 Pending
50 Tari Eason HOU ATL @ GSV Points 11.5 21.3 D 1.6 -5 Pending
51 Alperen Sengun HOU ATL @ GSV 3-Pointers Made 0.5 21.1 D 3.8 0 Pending
52 Dillon Brooks PHX OKC @ PHX Points 15.5 20.9 D 0.9 -5 Pending
53 Ace Bailey UTA UTA @ MEM Points 11.5 20 D -0.1 -5 Pending
Showing 1–25 of 385 picks
← Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next →

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.