📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← May 12 →
Wins
5
Losses
1
Win %
83.3%
Pending
0
Mon 11/2 Sun 11/1 Sat 10/31 Fri 10/30 Thu 10/29 Wed 10/28 Tue 10/27 Mon 10/26 Sun 10/25 Sat 10/24 Fri 10/23 Thu 10/22 Wed 10/21 Tue 10/20
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
Rebounds 6.5 OVER
55.9 C
  • Heavy minutes projection
Raw
48
Clean
15.4
Fit
5
3
Rebounds 7.5 OVER
54.5 C
Raw
45
Clean
15.4
Fit
5
12
Points 16.5 OVER
49.4 D
  • Heavy minutes projection
Raw
45
Clean
15.3
Fit
4
23
Points 17.5 OVER
43.3 D
Raw
32
Clean
15.8
Fit
4

📋 Full Board (60 picks · Page 1/3)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
1 Jaden McDaniels MIN MIN @ SAS Rebounds 6.5 55.9 C 15.4 5 Pending
3 Julius Randle MIN MIN @ SAS Rebounds 7.5 54.5 C 15.4 5 Pending
12 Jaden McDaniels MIN MIN @ SAS Points 16.5 49.4 D 15.3 4 Pending
23 Julius Randle MIN MIN @ SAS Points 17.5 43.3 D 15.8 4 Pending
37 Jaden McDaniels MIN MIN @ SAS Assists 3.5 39.8 D 14.1 5 Pending
40 MIN MIN MIN @ SAS ML -110 39 D 6.8 8 Pending
51 Julius Randle MIN MIN @ SAS Assists 4.5 36.4 D 13.3 5 Pending
70 Julian Champagnie SAS MIN @ SAS Points 8.5 30.5 D 11.5 -5 Pending
78 Dylan Harper SAS MIN @ SAS Points 12.5 27.5 D 11 -5 Pending
95 Julian Champagnie SAS MIN @ SAS Rebounds 6.5 23.4 D 11.3 -5 Pending
127 Dylan Harper SAS MIN @ SAS Rebounds 4.5 20.7 D 11.2 -5 Pending
133 Julian Champagnie SAS MIN @ SAS Assists 2.5 20.5 D 10.7 -5 Pending
330 Naz Reid MIN MIN @ SAS Rebounds 8.5 15.5 D 2.6 -5 Pending
423 Naz Reid MIN MIN @ SAS Points 12.5 13.3 D 2.2 -5 Pending
445 Terrence Shannon Jr. MIN MIN @ SAS Points 8.5 13 D 0.1 -5 Pending
450 Jaden McDaniels MIN MIN @ SAS 3-Pointers Made 2.5 13 D 3.7 0 Pending
451 Julius Randle MIN MIN @ SAS 3-Pointers Made 2.5 13 D 4.5 0 Pending
466 Rudy Gobert MIN MIN @ SAS Rebounds 11.5 12.7 D 2.6 -5 Pending
480 Terrence Shannon Jr. MIN MIN @ SAS Rebounds 3.5 12.4 D 0.7 -5 Pending
527 Rudy Gobert MIN MIN @ SAS Points 8.5 11.6 D 2 -5 Pending
550 Devin Vassell SAS MIN @ SAS Points 13.5 11.1 D 2.9 -5 Pending
556 Stephon Castle SAS MIN @ SAS Points 18.5 10.9 D 2.8 -5 Pending
573 De'Aaron Fox SAS MIN @ SAS Points 18.5 10.6 D 2.4 -5 Pending
574 Keldon Johnson SAS MIN @ SAS Points 8.5 10.6 D 0.3 -5 Pending
787 Devin Vassell SAS MIN @ SAS Assists 3.5 8.2 D 2.6 -5 Pending
Showing 1–25 of 60 picks
← Prev 1 2 3 Next →

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.