📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← May 11 – May 24 →
Wins
26
Losses
52
Push
6
Win %
33.3%
Pending
0
Fri 10/30 Thu 10/29 Wed 10/28 Tue 10/27 Mon 10/26 Sun 10/25 Sat 10/24 Fri 10/23 Thu 10/22 Wed 10/21 Tue 10/20 Mon 10/19 Sun 10/18 Sat 10/17
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
Assists 8.5 OVER
65.9 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
Raw
63
Clean
20.3
Fit
5
2
Points 17.5 OVER
59.5 C+
  • Projected edge vs line
  • Heavy minutes projection
Raw
63
Clean
16.2
Fit
4
3
Assists 1.5 OVER
57.5 C+
Raw
55
Clean
15.3
Fit
5
4
Assists 7.5 OVER
53.9 C
  • Heavy minutes projection
Raw
47
Clean
16
Fit
5

📋 Full Board (1478 picks · Page 35/60)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
851 Jazz Chisholm Jr. NYY TB @ NYY Runs Batted In 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
852 Jeff McNeil OAK OAK @ ATHLETICS@ Runs 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
853 Joey Ortiz MIL LAD @ MIL Total Bases 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
854 Jose Siri LAA TEX @ LAA Total Bases 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
855 Josh Bell MIN MIN @ BOS Runs 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
856 Josh Naylor SEA SEA @ KC Hits 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
857 Josh Naylor SEA SEA @ KC Total Bases 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
858 Kyle Isbel KC SEA @ KC Hits 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
859 Kyle Schwarber PHI CLE @ PHI Runs 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
860 Logan O'Hoppe LAA TEX @ LAA Hits 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
861 Luke Keaschall MIN MIN @ BOS Runs Batted In 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
862 Luke Raley SEA SEA @ KC Hits 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
863 Matt Olson ATL WSH @ ATL Hits 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
864 Michael Conforto CHC HOU @ CHC Runs Batted In 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
865 Mitch Garver SEA SEA @ KC Hits 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
866 Mitch Garver SEA SEA @ KC Runs 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
867 Nico Hoerner CHC HOU @ CHC Hits 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
868 Oneil Cruz PIT PIT @ TOR Hits 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
869 Oswald Peraza LAA TEX @ LAA Runs Batted In 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
870 Ozzie Albies ATL WSH @ ATL Hits 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
871 Ozzie Albies ATL WSH @ ATL Runs 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
872 Ozzie Albies ATL WSH @ ATL Total Bases 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
873 Paul Goldschmidt NYY TB @ NYY Hits 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
874 Paul Goldschmidt NYY TB @ NYY Runs Batted In 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
875 Randy Arozarena SEA SEA @ KC Hits 1.5 4.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
Showing 851–875 of 1478 picks

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.