📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← May 30 →
Wins
2
Losses
4
Win %
33.3%
Pending
0
Fri 10/30 Thu 10/29 Wed 10/28 Tue 10/27 Mon 10/26 Sun 10/25 Sat 10/24 Fri 10/23 Thu 10/22 Wed 10/21 Tue 10/20 Mon 10/19 Sun 10/18 Sat 10/17
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
Assists 8.5 OVER
55.7 C
  • Usage boost opportunity
Raw
52
Clean
15.3
Fit
5
3
Assists 4.5 OVER
47.7 D
  • Higher volatility than ideal
Raw
38
Clean
14.1
Fit
5
6
Rebounds 4.5 OVER
47.7 D
  • Usage boost opportunity
Raw
33
Clean
14.4
Fit
5
8
Points 27.5 OVER
46.4 D
Raw
37
Clean
16.2
Fit
4

📋 Full Board (67 picks · Page 1/3)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
1 Shai Gilgeous-Alexander OKC OKC @ SAS Assists 8.5 55.7 C 15.3 5 Pending
3 Victor Wembanyama SAS OKC @ SAS Assists 4.5 47.7 D 14.1 5 Pending
6 Shai Gilgeous-Alexander OKC OKC @ SAS Rebounds 4.5 47.7 D 14.4 5 Pending
8 Victor Wembanyama SAS OKC @ SAS Points 27.5 46.4 D 16.2 4 Pending
20 Shai Gilgeous-Alexander OKC OKC @ SAS Points 31.5 43.8 D 15.6 4 Pending
29 Victor Wembanyama SAS OKC @ SAS Rebounds 13.5 43.1 D 14.3 5 Pending
134 OKC OKC OKC @ SAS ML -110 32.5 D 5.3 8 Pending
156 Stephon Castle SAS OKC @ SAS Points 17.5 26.9 D 13.3 -5 Pending
157 Stephon Castle SAS OKC @ SAS Assists 8.5 24.3 D 14 -5 Pending
158 Jared McCain OKC OKC @ SAS Rebounds 3.5 23.8 D 11 -5 Pending
159 Jared McCain OKC OKC @ SAS Points 13.5 23.6 D 10.8 -5 Pending
161 Victor Wembanyama SAS OKC @ SAS 3-Pointers Made 3.5 23.1 D 5.9 0 Pending
171 Chet Holmgren OKC OKC @ SAS Rebounds 9.5 20.4 D 10.9 -5 Pending
173 Chet Holmgren OKC OKC @ SAS Points 14.5 20.1 D 12.5 -5 Pending
177 Stephon Castle SAS OKC @ SAS Rebounds 6.5 19.5 D 13.9 -5 Pending
178 Dylan Harper SAS OKC @ SAS Rebounds 4.5 19.3 D 10.4 -5 Pending
185 Chet Holmgren OKC OKC @ SAS Assists 2.5 17.4 D 11.5 -5 Pending
195 Dylan Harper SAS OKC @ SAS Assists 3.5 16.6 D 11 -5 Pending
205 Shai Gilgeous-Alexander OKC OKC @ SAS 3-Pointers Made 2.5 16.3 D 3.2 0 Pending
241 Jared McCain OKC OKC @ SAS Assists 2.5 14.1 D 7.7 -5 Pending
278 Luguentz Dort OKC OKC @ SAS Rebounds 3.5 13 D -0.2 -5 Pending
294 Isaiah Hartenstein OKC OKC @ SAS Points 9.5 12.5 D 0.4 -5 Pending
312 Dylan Harper SAS OKC @ SAS Points 11.5 11.4 D 9.6 -5 Pending
399 Devin Vassell SAS OKC @ SAS Points 14.5 9.4 D 1.8 -5 Pending
405 Luke Kornet SAS OKC @ SAS Points 2.5 9.3 D -1.3 -5 Pending
Showing 1–25 of 67 picks
← Prev 1 2 3 Next →

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.