📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Sep 21 – Oct 20 →
Wins
52
Losses
105
Push
2
Win %
33.1%
Pending
0
Wed 10/21 Tue 10/20 Mon 10/19 Sun 10/18 Sat 10/17 Fri 10/16 Thu 10/15 Wed 10/14 Tue 10/13 Mon 10/12 Sun 10/11 Sat 10/10 Fri 10/9 Thu 10/8
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
Assists 5.5 OVER
68.2 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
55
Clean
27.3
Fit
5
2
Rebounds 3.5 OVER
63.8 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
  • Higher volatility than ideal
Raw
46
Clean
25.2
Fit
5
3
Points 15.5 OVER
57.2 C+
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
41
Clean
26
Fit
4
4
NYK NYK @ PHI NBA
ML -110 ML
52.6 C
  • Strong injury edge
Raw
45
Clean
8.6
Fit
8

📋 Full Board (147 picks · Page 1/6)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
1 De'Aaron Fox — Assists 5.5 68.2 B- 27.3 5 Pending
2 De'Aaron Fox — Rebounds 3.5 63.8 B- 25.2 5 Pending
3 De'Aaron Fox — Points 15.5 57.2 C+ 26 4 Pending
4 NYK NYK NYK @ PHI ML -110 52.6 C 8.6 8 Pending
5 Derrick White BOS DET @ BOS Rebounds 3.5 52.1 C 13.5 5 Pending
6 Cade Cunningham — Rebounds 5.5 45.4 D 14.6 5 Pending
7 Cade Cunningham — Assists 8.5 42.6 D 14.8 5 Pending
8 DET DET DET @ BOS ML -110 41.7 D 7.9 8 Pending
9 Cade Cunningham — Points 24.5 38.5 D 14.7 4 Pending
10 Derrick White BOS DET @ BOS Assists 4.5 35.9 D 14.9 5 Pending
11 De'Aaron Fox — 3-Pointers Made 1.5 35.2 D 14.6 0 Pending
12 OKC OKC OKC @ SAS ML -110 34 D 5.4 8 Pending
13 Derrick White BOS DET @ BOS Points 15.5 33.7 D 13.8 4 Pending
14 Cade Cunningham — 3-Pointers Made 2.5 25.5 D 5.3 0 Pending
15 Keldon Johnson SAS OKC @ SAS Rebounds 3.5 23.3 D 0.4 -5 Pending
16 LeBron James PHI NYK @ PHI Points 15.5 21.9 D 2.4 -5 Pending
17 Devin Vassell SAS OKC @ SAS Rebounds 3.5 20.9 D 1.3 -5 Pending
18 Chet Holmgren — Rebounds 8.5 19.7 D 11.1 -5 Pending
19 Neemias Queta BOS DET @ BOS Rebounds 7.5 19.6 D 0.9 -5 Pending
20 Dylan Harper SAS OKC @ SAS Points 15.5 18.4 D 1.5 -5 Pending
21 Julian Champagnie SAS OKC @ SAS Points 8.5 18.3 D 0.8 -5 Pending
22 Daniss Jenkins DET DET @ BOS Points 7.5 18.3 D 0.9 -5 Pending
23 Chet Holmgren — Points 12.5 17.1 D 11.6 -5 Pending
24 Derrick White BOS DET @ BOS 3-Pointers Made 2.5 16.5 D 4.6 0 Pending
25 Dylan Harper SAS OKC @ SAS Rebounds 4.5 15.8 D 0.4 -5 Pending
Showing 1–25 of 147 picks
← Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next →

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.