📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Nov 3 – Nov 9
Wins
9
Losses
20
Win %
31%
Pending
6
Mon 11/9 Sun 11/8 Sat 11/7 Fri 11/6 Thu 11/5 Wed 11/4 Mon 11/2 Sun 11/1 Sat 10/31 Fri 10/30 Thu 10/29 Wed 10/28 Tue 10/27 Mon 10/26
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
Assists 4.5 OVER
72.4 B
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Strong matchup profile
Raw
83
Clean
16.6
Fit
5
2
Assists 5.5 OVER
68.2 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
55
Clean
27.3
Fit
5
3
Assists 3.5 OVER
64.3 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Strong matchup profile
Raw
69
Clean
15.3
Fit
5
4
Rebounds 3.5 OVER
63.8 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
  • Higher volatility than ideal
Raw
46
Clean
25.2
Fit
5

📋 Full Board (325 picks · Page 1/13)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
1 Austin Reaves LAL ATL @ LAL Assists 4.5 72.4 B 16.6 5 Pending
2 De'Aaron Fox — Assists 5.5 68.2 B- 27.3 5 Pending
3 Amen Thompson HOU DEN @ HOU Assists 3.5 64.3 B- 15.3 5 Pending
4 De'Aaron Fox — Rebounds 3.5 63.8 B- 25.2 5 Pending
5 De'Aaron Fox — Points 13.5 60.5 C+ 26 4 Pending
6 Amen Thompson HOU DEN @ HOU Rebounds 6.5 60.2 C+ 16.6 5 Pending
7 Austin Reaves LAL ATL @ LAL Rebounds 3.5 58.8 C+ 15.3 5 Pending
8 Alperen Sengun HOU DEN @ HOU Rebounds 9.5 57.6 C+ 15.9 5 Pending
9 Alperen Sengun HOU DEN @ HOU Assists 6.5 55.5 C 13.9 5 Pending
10 Amen Thompson HOU DEN @ HOU Points 16.5 52.6 C 16 4 Pending
11 Alperen Sengun HOU DEN @ HOU Points 20.5 50.1 C 15.7 4 Pending
12 Cade Cunningham — Rebounds 5.5 45.4 D 14.6 5 Pending
13 Austin Reaves LAL ATL @ LAL Points 21.5 44.6 D 14.5 4 Pending
14 Cade Cunningham — Assists 8.5 42.6 D 14.8 5 Pending
15 CLE CLE CLE @ CHA ML -110 39.3 D 7.9 8 Pending
16 Cade Cunningham — Points 26.5 38.5 D 14.7 4 Pending
17 IND IND IND @ DAL ML -110 37.7 D 5.7 8 Pending
18 PHX PHX PHX @ SAS ML -110 36.7 D 5.7 8 Pending
19 De'Aaron Fox — 3-Pointers Made 1.5 35.2 D 14.6 0 Pending
20 GSW GSW GSW @ NOP ML -110 32.7 D 6.3 8 Pending
21 Amen Thompson HOU DEN @ HOU 3-Pointers Made 0.5 31.6 D 3.8 0 Pending
22 ATL ATL ATL @ LAL ML -110 31.5 D 6 8 Pending
23 HOU HOU DEN @ HOU ML -110 29.6 D 4.8 8 Pending
24 Alperen Sengun HOU DEN @ HOU 3-Pointers Made 0.5 28.5 D 3.8 0 Pending
25 Tari Eason HOU DEN @ HOU Points 9.5 28.3 D 1.6 -5 Pending
Showing 1–25 of 325 picks
← Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next →

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.