📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Oct 30 – Nov 12
Wins
24
Losses
44
Win %
35.3%
Pending
6
Thu 11/12 Wed 11/11 Tue 11/10 Mon 11/9 Sun 11/8 Sat 11/7 Fri 11/6 Thu 11/5 Wed 11/4 Mon 11/2 Sun 11/1 Sat 10/31 Fri 10/30 Thu 10/29
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
MIN MIN @ DAL NBA
ML -110 ML
46.2 D
Raw
34
Clean
7.5
Fit
8
2
Rebounds 5.5 OVER
45.4 D
  • Heavy minutes projection
Raw
29
Clean
14.6
Fit
5
3
PHX PHX @ CHA NBA
ML -110 ML
43.2 D
  • Strong injury edge
Raw
26
Clean
8.7
Fit
8
4
Assists 8.5 OVER
42.6 D
  • Heavy minutes projection
Raw
26
Clean
14.8
Fit
5

📋 Full Board (180 picks · Page 4/8)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
76 Collin Gillespie PHX PHX @ CHA Points 8.5 0 D -1.8 -5 Pending
77 Rudy Gobert MIN MIN @ DAL Assists 1.5 0 D -3.5 -5 Pending
78 Jakob Poeltl TOR TOR @ PHI Assists 2.5 0 D -2.5 -5 Pending
79 Collin Gillespie PHX PHX @ CHA 3-Pointers Made 1.5 0 D -11.3 -6 Pending
80 Ja'Kobe Walter TOR TOR @ PHI Rebounds 3.5 0 D -1.2 -5 Pending
81 Alex Sarr WSH WSH @ DET Points 9.5 0 D -1.1 -5 Pending
82 Coby White BOS — 3-Pointers Made 2.5 0 D -20 -6 Pending
83 LaMelo Ball MIN MIN @ DAL 3-Pointers Made 3.5 0 D -8.2 -6 Pending
84 Devin Booker PHX PHX @ CHA Rebounds 3.5 0 D -1.9 -5 Pending
85 Tre Johnson WSH WSH @ DET 3-Pointers Made 1.5 0 D -20 -6 Pending
86 Cooper Flagg DAL MIN @ DAL Assists 6.5 0 D -0.8 -5 Pending
87 Naz Reid CHA PHX @ CHA Points 20.5 0 D 1.9 -5 Pending
88 Collin Gillespie PHX PHX @ CHA Rebounds 2.5 0 D -3.6 -5 Pending
89 LaMelo Ball MIN MIN @ DAL Points 20.5 0 D -0.3 -5 Pending
90 VJ Edgecombe PHI TOR @ PHI 3-Pointers Made 1.5 0 D -11 -6 Pending
91 AJ Dybantsa WSH WSH @ DET 3-Pointers Made 1.5 0 D -1.1 -6 Pending
92 Joel Embiid PHI TOR @ PHI Points 19.5 0 D -2.2 -5 Pending
93 Oso Ighodaro PHX PHX @ CHA Rebounds 5.5 0 D -0.2 -5 Pending
94 Kyshawn George WSH WSH @ DET 3-Pointers Made 1.5 0 D -20 -6 Pending
95 Jaden McDaniels MIN MIN @ DAL Points 17.5 0 D 0.6 -5 Pending
96 Jaden McDaniels MIN MIN @ DAL Rebounds 5.5 0 D -0.5 -5 Pending
97 Tre Johnson WSH WSH @ DET Points 7.5 0 D -14.4 -5 Pending
98 Joel Embiid PHI TOR @ PHI 3-Pointers Made 0.5 0 D -12.1 -6 Pending
99 Cooper Flagg DAL MIN @ DAL 3-Pointers Made 1.5 0 D -11.9 -6 Pending
100 Devin Booker PHX PHX @ CHA 3-Pointers Made 1.5 0 D -9.9 -6 Pending
Showing 76–100 of 180 picks

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.