Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 551 | MLB | Masyn Winn 10 games | STL vs MIL@STL | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 552 | MLB | Mauricio Dubon 10 games | ATL vs ATL@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 553 | MLB | Max Kepler 9 games | AZ vs ARI@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 554 | MLB | Max Muncy 10 games | LAD vs COL@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +121 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 555 | MLB | Michael Busch 10 games | CHC vs CHC@BAL | H | 1.5 | +260 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 556 | MLB | Michael Busch 10 games | CHC vs CHC@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +375 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 557 | MLB | Michael Conforto 10 games | CHC vs CHC@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 558 | MLB | Miguel Vargas 10 games | CWS vs BOS@CHW | HR | 0.5 | +350 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 559 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 10 games | ATL vs ATL@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 560 | MLB | Nasim Nunez 10 games | WSH vs HOU@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +1400 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 561 | MLB | Nasim Nunez 10 games | WSH vs HOU@WSN | RBI | 0.5 | +318 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 562 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs MIL@STL | HR | 0.5 | +1200 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 563 | MLB | Nelson Velazquez 10 games | STL vs MIL@STL | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 564 | MLB | Nick Gonzales 10 games | PIT vs ATL@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 565 | MLB | Nick Kurtz 10 games | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | HR | 0.5 | +250 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 566 | MLB | Nick Kurtz 10 games | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | RBI | 0.5 | +160 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 567 | MLB | Nick Loftin 10 games | KC vs KCR@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 568 | MLB | Nico Hoerner 10 games | CHC vs CHC@BAL | RBI | 0.5 | +235 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 569 | MLB | Nolan Arenado 10 games | AZ vs ARI@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 570 | MLB | Ozzie Albies 10 games | ATL vs ATL@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 571 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs CHC@BAL | RBI | 0.5 | +135 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 572 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 10 games | CHC vs CHC@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +275 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 573 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 10 games | CHC vs CHC@BAL | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 574 | MLB | Rafael Devers 10 games | SF vs TOR@SFG | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 575 | MLB | Randy Arozarena 10 games | SEA vs SEA@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 576 | MLB | Rhys Hoskins 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 577 | MLB | Rhys Hoskins 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +210 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 578 | MLB | Richie Palacios 10 games | TB vs NYY@TBR | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 579 | MLB | Richie Palacios 10 games | TB vs NYY@TBR | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 580 | MLB | Romy Gonzalez 6 games | BOS vs BOS@CHW | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 581 | MLB | Royce Lewis 10 games | MIN vs CLE@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +182 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 582 | MLB | Sal Stewart 10 games | CIN vs PHI@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 583 | MLB | Salvador Perez 10 games | KC vs KCR@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 584 | MLB | Seiya Suzuki 10 games | CHC vs CHC@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 585 | MLB | Shea Langeliers 10 games | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | HR | 0.5 | +350 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 586 | MLB | Spencer Steer 10 games | CIN vs PHI@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 587 | MLB | Spencer Steer 10 games | CIN vs PHI@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +170 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 588 | MLB | Steven Kwan 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +273 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 589 | MLB | Sung-Mun Song 10 games | SD vs ARI@SDP | H | 0.5 | -130 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 590 | MLB | Taylor Walls 10 games | TB vs NYY@TBR | RBI | 0.5 | +335 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 591 | MLB | Taylor Ward 10 games | BAL vs CHC@BAL | H | 1.5 | +260 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 592 | MLB | Taylor Ward 10 games | BAL vs CHC@BAL | RBI | 0.5 | +181 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 593 | MLB | Teoscar Hernandez 10 games | LAD vs COL@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 594 | MLB | TJ Friedl 10 games | CIN vs PHI@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 595 | MLB | TJ Rumfield 10 games | COL vs COL@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +228 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 596 | MLB | Trea Turner 10 games | PHI vs PHI@CIN | H | 1.5 | +190 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 597 | MLB | Trea Turner 10 games | PHI vs PHI@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +202 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 598 | MLB | Trent Grisham 10 games | NYY vs NYY@TBR | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 599 | MLB | Trent Grisham 10 games | NYY vs NYY@TBR | RBI | 0.5 | +220 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 600 | MLB | Trevor Larnach 10 games | MIN vs CLE@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.