Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 851 | MLB | Carson Benge | NYM vs KCR@NYM | R | 0.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 852 | MLB | Carson Benge | NYM vs KCR@NYM | TB | 1.5 | +138 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 853 | MLB | Carson Kelly | CHC vs CHC@BAL | TB | 1.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 854 | MLB | Carter Jensen | KC vs KCR@NYM | R | 0.5 | +105 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 855 | MLB | Carter Jensen | KC vs KCR@NYM | TB | 1.5 | +140 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 856 | MLB | Casey Schmitt | SF vs COL@SFG | R | 0.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 857 | MLB | Casey Schmitt | SF vs COL@SFG | TB | 1.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 858 | MLB | Ceddanne Rafaela | BOS vs BOS@CHW | R | 0.5 | +100 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 859 | MLB | Ceddanne Rafaela | BOS vs BOS@CHW | TB | 1.5 | +110 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 860 | MLB | Cedric Mullins | TB vs NYY@TBR | TB | 1.5 | +180 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 861 | MLB | Chandler Simpson | TB vs NYY@TBR | R | 0.5 | +195 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 862 | MLB | Chandler Simpson | TB vs NYY@TBR | TB | 1.5 | +180 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 863 | MLB | Chase DeLauter | CLE vs CLE@MIN | R | 0.5 | +105 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 864 | MLB | Chase DeLauter | CLE vs CLE@MIN | TB | 1.5 | +110 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 865 | MLB | Chase Meidroth | CWS vs BOS@CHW | R | 0.5 | +135 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 866 | MLB | Chase Meidroth | CWS vs BOS@CHW | TB | 1.5 | +157 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 867 | MLB | Christian Yelich | MIL vs MIL@STL | R | 0.5 | -115 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 868 | MLB | Christian Yelich | MIL vs MIL@STL | TB | 1.5 | +141 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 869 | MLB | Coby Mayo | BAL vs CHC@BAL | TB | 1.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 870 | MLB | Cody Bellinger | NYY vs NYY@TBR | R | 0.5 | +155 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 871 | MLB | Cody Bellinger | NYY vs NYY@TBR | TB | 1.5 | +155 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 872 | MLB | Colby Thomas | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | R | 0.5 | +165 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 873 | MLB | Colby Thomas | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | TB | 1.5 | +180 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 874 | MLB | Cole Carrigg | COL vs COL@SFG | R | 0.5 | +130 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 875 | MLB | Cole Carrigg | COL vs COL@SFG | TB | 1.5 | +144 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 876 | MLB | Cole Young | SEA vs SEA@MIA | R | 0.5 | +155 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 877 | MLB | Cole Young | SEA vs SEA@MIA | TB | 1.5 | +150 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 878 | MLB | Colson Montgomery | CWS vs BOS@CHW | R | 0.5 | +105 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 879 | MLB | Colson Montgomery | CWS vs BOS@CHW | TB | 1.5 | +130 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 880 | MLB | Colt Emerson | SEA vs SEA@MIA | R | 0.5 | +160 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 881 | MLB | Colt Emerson | SEA vs SEA@MIA | TB | 1.5 | +180 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 882 | MLB | Colt Keith | DET vs ATHLETICS@ | R | 0.5 | +110 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 883 | MLB | Colt Keith | DET vs ATHLETICS@ | TB | 1.5 | +150 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 884 | MLB | Connor Wong | BOS vs BOS@CHW | TB | 1.5 | +180 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 885 | MLB | Cooper Ingle | CLE vs CLE@MIN | TB | 1.5 | +160 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 886 | MLB | Cooper Pratt | MIL vs MIL@STL | R | 0.5 | +130 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 887 | MLB | Cooper Pratt | MIL vs MIL@STL | TB | 1.5 | +165 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 888 | MLB | Corbin Carroll | AZ vs ARI@SDP | R | 0.5 | +105 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 889 | MLB | Corbin Carroll | AZ vs ARI@SDP | TB | 1.5 | +123 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 890 | MLB | Daniel Schneemann | CLE vs CLE@MIN | R | 0.5 | +140 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 891 | MLB | Dansby Swanson | CHC vs CHC@BAL | TB | 1.5 | +145 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 892 | MLB | David Peterson | CHC vs CHC@BAL | K | 4.5 | +128 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 893 | MLB | Denzer Guzman | LAA vs LAA@TEX | R | 0.5 | +225 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 894 | MLB | Denzer Guzman | LAA vs LAA@TEX | TB | 1.5 | +200 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 895 | MLB | Dillon Dingler | DET vs ATHLETICS@ | R | 0.5 | +100 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 896 | MLB | Dillon Dingler | DET vs ATHLETICS@ | TB | 1.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 897 | MLB | Dominic Canzone | SEA vs SEA@MIA | R | 0.5 | +110 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 898 | MLB | Dominic Canzone | SEA vs SEA@MIA | TB | 1.5 | +121 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 899 | MLB | Dominic Smith | ATL vs ATL@PIT | R | 0.5 | +135 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 900 | MLB | Dominic Smith | ATL vs ATL@PIT | TB | 1.5 | +135 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.