Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 851 | MLB | Joey Meneses 8 games | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | H | 0.5 | -210 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 23 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 852 | MLB | Teoscar Hernandez 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | H | 0.5 | -187 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 853 | MLB | Elias Diaz 10 games | TEX vs HOU@TEX | H | 0.5 | -140 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 22 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 854 | MLB | Eric Haase 10 games | SF vs COL@SFG | H | 0.5 | -141 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 22 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 855 | MLB | Gavin Sheets 10 games | SD vs TOR@SDP | H | 0.5 | -143 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 22 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 856 | MLB | Leody Taveras 10 games | BAL vs KCR@BAL | H | 0.5 | -150 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 22 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 857 | MLB | Colby Thomas 10 games | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | H | 0.5 | -125 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 21 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 858 | MLB | Bryce Harper 10 games | PHI vs PHI@DET | H | 0.5 | -189 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 20 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 859 | MLB | Henry Bolte 10 games | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | H | 0.5 | -190 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 20 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 860 | MLB | Troy Johnston 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | H | 0.5 | -163 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 20 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 861 | MLB | William Contreras 10 games | MIL vs MIL@PIT | H | 0.5 | -220 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 20 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 862 | MLB | A.J. Ewing | NYM vs BOS@NYM | TB | 1.5 | +120 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 863 | MLB | Adley Rutschman | BAL vs KCR@BAL | R | 0.5 | +105 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 864 | MLB | Adley Rutschman | BAL vs KCR@BAL | TB | 1.5 | +120 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 865 | MLB | Alan Roden | MIN vs LAA@MIN | R | 0.5 | +135 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 866 | MLB | Alan Roden | MIN vs LAA@MIN | TB | 1.5 | +150 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 867 | MLB | Alec Bohm | PHI vs PHI@DET | R | 0.5 | +165 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 868 | MLB | Alec Bohm | PHI vs PHI@DET | TB | 1.5 | +150 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 869 | MLB | Alec Burleson | STL vs ATL@STL | R | 0.5 | +115 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 870 | MLB | Alec Burleson | STL vs ATL@STL | TB | 1.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 871 | MLB | Alejandro Kirk | TOR vs TOR@SDP | R | 0.5 | +155 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 872 | MLB | Alejandro Kirk | TOR vs TOR@SDP | TB | 1.5 | +170 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 873 | MLB | Alejandro Osuna | TEX vs HOU@TEX | R | 0.5 | +180 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 874 | MLB | Alex Bregman | CHC vs CHC@CIN | R | 0.5 | -115 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 875 | MLB | Alex Bregman | CHC vs CHC@CIN | TB | 1.5 | +115 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 876 | MLB | Alika Williams | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | R | 0.5 | +165 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 877 | MLB | Andres Gimenez | TOR vs TOR@SDP | R | 0.5 | +185 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 878 | MLB | Andres Gimenez | TOR vs TOR@SDP | TB | 1.5 | +225 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 879 | MLB | Andrew Benintendi | CWS vs ATHLETICS@ | R | 0.5 | +200 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 880 | MLB | Andy Pages | LAD vs ARI@LAD | TB | 1.5 | +110 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 881 | MLB | Anthony Seigler | BOS vs BOS@NYM | R | 0.5 | +135 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 882 | MLB | Anthony Seigler | BOS vs BOS@NYM | TB | 1.5 | +155 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 883 | MLB | Austin Riley | ATL vs ATL@STL | R | 0.5 | +130 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 884 | MLB | Austin Riley | ATL vs ATL@STL | TB | 1.5 | +140 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 885 | MLB | Austin Wells | NYY vs NYY@WSN | R | 0.5 | +145 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 886 | MLB | Austin Wells | NYY vs NYY@WSN | TB | 1.5 | +185 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 887 | MLB | Ben Malgeri | DET vs PHI@DET | R | 0.5 | +230 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 888 | MLB | Ben Malgeri | DET vs PHI@DET | TB | 1.5 | +210 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 889 | MLB | Ben Rice | NYY vs NYY@WSN | R | 0.5 | -140 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 890 | MLB | Ben Rice | NYY vs NYY@WSN | TB | 1.5 | -120 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 891 | MLB | Blaze Alexander | BAL vs KCR@BAL | R | 0.5 | +140 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 892 | MLB | Blaze Alexander | BAL vs KCR@BAL | TB | 1.5 | +140 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 893 | MLB | Bo Bichette | NYM vs BOS@NYM | R | 0.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 894 | MLB | Bo Bichette | NYM vs BOS@NYM | TB | 1.5 | +140 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 895 | MLB | Bobby Witt Jr. | KC vs KCR@BAL | R | 0.5 | -110 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 896 | MLB | Bobby Witt Jr. | KC vs KCR@BAL | TB | 1.5 | +105 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 897 | MLB | Braden Montgomery | CWS vs ATHLETICS@ | R | 0.5 | +125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 898 | MLB | Braden Montgomery | CWS vs ATHLETICS@ | TB | 1.5 | +150 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 899 | MLB | Brandon Lowe | PIT vs MIL@PIT | TB | 1.5 | +145 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 900 | MLB | Brandon Marsh | PHI vs PHI@DET | R | 0.5 | +136 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.