Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 751 | MLB | Mike Trout 10 games | LAA vs SEA@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 752 | MLB | Mike Trout 10 games | LAA vs SEA@LAA | RBI | 0.5 | +219 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 753 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 10 games | ATL vs ATL@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 754 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 10 games | ATL vs ATL@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +332 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 755 | MLB | Moises Ballesteros 10 games | LAA vs SEA@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 756 | MLB | Mookie Betts 10 games | LAD vs LAD@CIN | RBI | 1.5 | +400 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 757 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs SFG@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +234 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 758 | MLB | Nathaniel Lowe 10 games | CLE vs CHW@CLE | H | 1.5 | +300 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 759 | MLB | Nathaniel Lowe 10 games | CLE vs CHW@CLE | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 760 | MLB | Nathaniel Lowe 10 games | CLE vs CHW@CLE | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 761 | MLB | Nick Gonzales 10 games | PIT vs MIL@PIT | RBI | 0.5 | +335 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 762 | MLB | Nick Loftin 10 games | KC vs KCR@HOU | H | 0.5 | -134 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 763 | MLB | Nolan Arenado 10 games | AZ vs MIA@ARI | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 764 | MLB | Nolan Gorman 10 games | STL vs SFG@STL | H | 1.5 | +400 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 765 | MLB | Nolan Gorman 10 games | STL vs SFG@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +193 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 766 | MLB | Oneil Cruz 10 games | PIT vs MIL@PIT | H | 1.5 | +475 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 767 | MLB | Oneil Cruz 10 games | PIT vs MIL@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 768 | MLB | Oneil Cruz 10 games | PIT vs MIL@PIT | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 769 | MLB | Ozzie Albies 10 games | ATL vs ATL@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +220 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 770 | MLB | Patrick Bailey 10 games | CLE vs CHW@CLE | H | 1.5 | +380 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 771 | MLB | Pedro Ramirez 10 games | CHC vs ATL@CHC | H | 1.5 | +320 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 772 | MLB | Pedro Ramirez 10 games | CHC vs ATL@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 773 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs BAL@NYM | H | 1.5 | +240 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 774 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs BAL@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +300 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 775 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs BAL@NYM | RBI | 1.5 | +500 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 776 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 10 games | CHC vs ATL@CHC | H | 1.5 | +220 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 777 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 10 games | CHC vs ATL@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +375 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 778 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 10 games | CHC vs ATL@CHC | RBI | 1.5 | +500 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 779 | MLB | Petey Halpin 10 games | CLE vs CHW@CLE | RBI | 0.5 | +236 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 780 | MLB | Randal Grichuk 10 games | CWS vs CHW@CLE | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 781 | MLB | Randal Grichuk 10 games | CWS vs CHW@CLE | RBI | 0.5 | +172 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 782 | MLB | Rece Hinds 6 games | BAL vs BAL@NYM | RBI | 0.5 | +285 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 783 | MLB | Richie Palacios 10 games | TB vs ATHLETICS@ | H | 1.5 | +400 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 784 | MLB | Riley Greene 10 games | DET vs DET@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 785 | MLB | Roman Anthony 10 games | BOS vs BOS@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 786 | MLB | Roman Anthony 10 games | BOS vs BOS@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 787 | MLB | Ronald Acuna Jr. 10 games | ATL vs ATL@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 788 | MLB | Ronald Acuna Jr. 10 games | ATL vs ATL@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +196 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +-0 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 789 | MLB | Ryan Jeffers 10 games | MIN vs NYY@MIN | H | 1.5 | +340 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 790 | MLB | Ryan McMahon 10 games | NYY vs NYY@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +234 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 791 | MLB | Ryan O'Hearn 10 games | PIT vs MIL@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 792 | MLB | Ryan O'Hearn 10 games | PIT vs MIL@PIT | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 793 | MLB | Salvador Perez 10 games | KC vs KCR@HOU | H | 1.5 | +320 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 794 | MLB | Salvador Perez 10 games | KC vs KCR@HOU | RBI | 0.5 | +215 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 795 | MLB | Samad Taylor 10 games | SD vs SDP@COL | H | 1.5 | +240 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 796 | MLB | Sean Murphy 10 games | ATL vs ATL@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +282 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 797 | MLB | Seiya Suzuki 10 games | CHC vs ATL@CHC | H | 1.5 | +260 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 798 | MLB | Seiya Suzuki 10 games | CHC vs ATL@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +186 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 799 | MLB | Shay Whitcomb 10 games | SF vs SFG@STL | H | 1.5 | +360 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 800 | MLB | Shay Whitcomb 10 games | SF vs SFG@STL | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.