📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Oct 19 – Oct 25
Wins
24
Losses
12
Win %
66.7%
Pending
6
Sun 10/25 Sat 10/24 Fri 10/23 Thu 10/22 Wed 10/21 Tue 10/20 Mon 10/19 Sun 10/18 Sat 10/17 Fri 10/16 Thu 10/15 Wed 10/14 Tue 10/13 Mon 10/12
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
Assists 1.5 OVER
64.1 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Usage boost opportunity
  • Strong matchup profile
Raw
70
Clean
14.8
Fit
5
2
Points 16.5 OVER
62.5 C+
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Usage boost opportunity
Raw
69
Clean
16.2
Fit
4
3
Assists 5.5 OVER
58.5 C+
  • Heavy minutes projection
Raw
55
Clean
16.6
Fit
5
4
Rebounds 5.5 OVER
58 C+
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Usage boost opportunity
  • Strong matchup profile
Raw
52
Clean
15.6
Fit
5

📋 Full Board (277 picks · Page 1/12)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
1 Rui Hachimura LAC OKC @ LAC Assists 1.5 64.1 B- 14.8 5 Pending
2 Rui Hachimura LAC OKC @ LAC Points 16.5 62.5 C+ 16.2 4 Pending
3 Austin Reaves LAL UTA @ LAL Assists 5.5 58.5 C+ 16.6 5 Pending
4 Rui Hachimura LAC OKC @ LAC Rebounds 5.5 58 C+ 15.6 5 Pending
5 Austin Reaves LAL UTA @ LAL Rebounds 4.5 50.5 C 15.3 5 Pending
6 DET DET DET @ PHI ML -110 50 D 9.9 8 Pending
7 Cade Cunningham — Rebounds 5.5 45.4 D 14.6 5 Pending
8 OKC OKC OKC @ LAC ML -110 43.8 D 7.4 8 Pending
9 MEM MEM MEM @ SAC ML -110 42 D 8 8 Pending
10 Rui Hachimura LAC OKC @ LAC 3-Pointers Made 2.5 41.9 D 7.1 0 Pending
11 MIN MIN MIN @ TOR ML -110 40.1 D 6.5 8 Pending
12 Cade Cunningham — Assists 9.5 39.3 D 14.8 5 Pending
13 Cade Cunningham — Points 26.5 38.5 D 14.7 4 Pending
14 Austin Reaves LAL UTA @ LAL Points 23.5 36.3 D 14.5 4 Pending
15 UTA UTA UTA @ LAL ML -110 35.2 D 5.7 8 Pending
16 IND IND IND @ BKN ML -110 32.1 D 5.7 8 Pending
17 Brook Lopez LAC OKC @ LAC Rebounds 4.5 30.9 D 2.1 -5 Pending
18 ORL ORL ORL @ NYK ML -110 26.9 D 4.9 8 Pending
19 Cade Cunningham — 3-Pointers Made 2.5 25.5 D 5.3 0 Pending
20 Darius Acuff Jr. SAC MEM @ SAC Points 20.5 20.9 D 11.6 -5 Pending
21 Darius Acuff Jr. SAC MEM @ SAC Assists 4.5 20.9 D 9.4 -5 Pending
22 Cason Wallace OKC OKC @ LAC Rebounds 2.5 20.1 D 0.1 -5 Pending
23 Chet Holmgren — Rebounds 8.5 19.7 D 11.1 -5 Pending
24 Jamal Shead TOR IND @ MIN Points 5.5 19.7 D 0.3 -5 Pending
25 Brook Lopez LAC OKC @ LAC Points 10.5 18.9 D 0.4 -5 Pending
Showing 1–25 of 277 picks
← Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next →

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.