Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1151 | MLB | Ryan Kreidler 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CHC | H | 0.5 | -139 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 30 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1152 | MLB | Ryan Waldschmidt 10 games | AZ vs STL@ARI | H | 0.5 | -140 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 30 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1153 | MLB | A.J. Ewing 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1154 | MLB | Adley Rutschman 10 games | BAL vs BAL@HOU | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1155 | MLB | Adley Rutschman 10 games | BAL vs BAL@HOU | RBI | 0.5 | +203 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1156 | MLB | Adley Rutschman 10 games | BAL vs BAL@HOU | TB | 1.5 | +140 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1157 | MLB | Alan Roden 6 games | MIN vs MIN@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1158 | MLB | Alan Roden 6 games | MIN vs MIN@CHC | R | 0.5 | +200 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1159 | MLB | Alec Bohm 10 games | PHI vs NYM@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1160 | MLB | Alec Bohm 10 games | PHI vs NYM@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +163 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1161 | MLB | Alec Burleson 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | H | 1.5 | +170 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1162 | MLB | Alec Burleson 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1163 | MLB | Alejandro Kirk 10 games | TOR vs CHW@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1164 | MLB | Amed Rosario 10 games | NYY vs LAD@NYY | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1165 | MLB | Andrew Benintendi 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1166 | MLB | Anthony Seigler 10 games | BOS vs TBR@BOS | R | 0.5 | +105 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1167 | MLB | Austin Martin 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1168 | MLB | Ben Williamson 10 games | TB vs TBR@BOS | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1169 | MLB | Blaze Jordan 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1170 | MLB | Bo Bichette 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1171 | MLB | Bo Bichette 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1172 | MLB | Bobby Witt Jr. 10 games | KC vs SDP@KCR | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1173 | MLB | Bobby Witt Jr. 10 games | KC vs SDP@KCR | RBI | 0.5 | +140 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1174 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | HR | 0.5 | +375 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1175 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | RBI | 0.5 | +191 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1176 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs NYM@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1177 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs NYM@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +211 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1178 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CHC | H | 1.5 | +230 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1179 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1180 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CHC | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1181 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CHC | TB | 1.5 | +138 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.9 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1182 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1183 | MLB | Bryan Torres 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | RBI | 0.5 | +226 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1184 | MLB | Bryce Harper 10 games | PHI vs NYM@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +360 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1185 | MLB | Bryce Harper 10 games | PHI vs NYM@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +162 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1186 | MLB | Bryson Stott 10 games | PHI vs NYM@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1187 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs SFG@SEA | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1188 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs SFG@SEA | R | 0.5 | +145 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1189 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs SFG@SEA | RBI | 0.5 | +193 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1190 | MLB | Carlos Cortes 10 games | ATH vs WSN@Athlet | H | 1.5 | +220 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1191 | MLB | Carlos Cortes 10 games | ATH vs WSN@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1192 | MLB | Carlos Cortes 10 games | ATH vs WSN@Athlet | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1193 | MLB | Carlos Cortes 10 games | ATH vs WSN@Athlet | RBI | 0.5 | +185 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1194 | MLB | Carlos Cortes 10 games | ATH vs WSN@Athlet | TB | 1.5 | +130 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 6.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1195 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1196 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | R | 0.5 | +175 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1197 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | TB | 1.5 | +200 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -1.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1198 | MLB | Carson Kelly 10 games | CHC vs MIN@CHC | H | 1.5 | +340 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | +-0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1199 | MLB | Carter Jensen 10 games | KC vs SDP@KCR | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1200 | MLB | Ceddanne Rafaela 10 games | BOS vs TBR@BOS | H | 1.5 | +200 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.