📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Oct 26 →
Wins
3
Losses
3
Win %
50%
Pending
0
Tue 10/27 Mon 10/26 Sun 10/25 Sat 10/24 Fri 10/23 Thu 10/22 Wed 10/21 Tue 10/20 Mon 10/19 Sun 10/18 Sat 10/17 Fri 10/16 Thu 10/15 Wed 10/14
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
8
Rebounds 9.5 OVER
56.9 C
  • Heavy minutes projection
Raw
49
Clean
15.9
Fit
5
10
MIA DAL @ PHI NBA
ML -110 ML
54.4 C
  • Strong injury edge
Raw
45
Clean
10.6
Fit
8
13
Assists 4.5 OVER
51.6 C
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Higher volatility than ideal
Raw
46
Clean
13.9
Fit
5
15
Assists 4.5 OVER
50.9 C
  • Heavy minutes projection
Raw
42
Clean
15.3
Fit
5

📋 Full Board (385 picks · Page 2/16)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
54 Chet Holmgren — Rebounds 8.5 19.7 D 11.1 -5 Pending
57 Ace Bailey UTA UTA @ MEM Assists 2.5 18.8 D 1.7 -5 Pending
58 Payton Pritchard BOS CHI @ BOS Assists 4.5 18.2 D 2.9 -5 Pending
59 Jalen Green PHX OKC @ PHX Rebounds 3.5 18 D 1 -5 Pending
60 Jalen Green PHX OKC @ PHX Points 14.5 18 D 1.2 -5 Pending
61 Ace Bailey UTA UTA @ MEM Rebounds 4.5 17.4 D 0.9 -5 Pending
64 Gui Santos GSW DEN @ GSW Rebounds 3.5 16.9 D 0.8 -5 Pending
66 Derrick White BOS CHI @ BOS 3-Pointers Made 2.5 16.5 D 4.6 0 Pending
67 Terrence Shannon Jr. MIN MIN @ CLE Points 8.5 16.3 D -0.7 -5 Pending
68 Neemias Queta BOS CHI @ BOS Rebounds 7.5 16.1 D 0.9 -5 Pending
69 Payton Pritchard BOS CHI @ BOS Points 16.5 15.8 D 1.3 -5 Pending
70 Dillon Brooks PHX OKC @ PHX Rebounds 3.5 15.6 D 0.2 -5 Pending
71 Brandin Podziemski GSW DEN @ GSW Points 15.5 15.4 D 1.6 -5 Pending
73 Gui Santos GSW DEN @ GSW Points 8.5 14.7 D -0.3 -5 Pending
75 Jalen Green PHX OKC @ PHX Assists 2.5 13.9 D 0.1 -5 Pending
77 Chet Holmgren — Assists 1.5 13.5 D 10 -5 Pending
80 Onyeka Okongwu ATL ATL @ HOU Points 11.5 12.5 D -0.2 -5 Pending
83 Cooper Flagg DAL MIA @ DAL Rebounds 5.5 12 D -0.4 -5 Pending
85 Brandin Podziemski GSW DEN @ GSW Rebounds 5.5 11.5 D 0.4 -5 Pending
86 Davion Mitchell MIA DAL @ PHI Points 10.5 11.4 D -1.6 -5 Pending
87 Tari Eason HOU ATL @ GSV Rebounds 5.5 11.4 D 1.7 -5 Pending
88 Cason Wallace OKC OKC @ PHX Rebounds 2.5 11.2 D 0.1 -5 Pending
89 James Harden CLE MIN @ CLE Points 17.5 10.7 D 2.2 -5 Pending
90 Dillon Brooks PHX OKC @ PHX Assists 1.5 10.3 D -0.7 -5 Pending
91 Payton Pritchard BOS CHI @ BOS Rebounds 3.5 10.2 D 2.1 -5 Pending
Showing 26–50 of 385 picks

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.