📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Oct 21 →
Wins
5
Losses
1
Win %
83.3%
Pending
0
Thu 10/22 Wed 10/21 Tue 10/20 Mon 10/19 Sun 10/18 Sat 10/17 Fri 10/16 Thu 10/15 Wed 10/14 Tue 10/13 Mon 10/12 Sun 10/11 Sat 10/10 Fri 10/9
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
GSV @ ATL WNBA
Points 11.5 OVER
76.4 B+
  • Projected edge vs line
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
75
Clean
28.3
Fit
4
2
GSV @ ATL WNBA
Assists 7.5 OVER
69.8 B
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
57
Clean
28.1
Fit
5
3
GSV @ ATL WNBA
Rebounds 3.5 OVER
62.5 C+
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
  • Higher volatility than ideal
Raw
41
Clean
26.7
Fit
5
4
GSV @ ATL WNBA
Points 15.5 OVER
61.7 C+
  • Heavy minutes projection
Raw
59
Clean
21.2
Fit
4

📋 Full Board (569 picks · Page 2/23)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
26 Gabby Williams GSV @ ATL Points 18.5 44.3 D 11.3 4 Pending
27 ATL ATL ATL @ ORL ML -110 44.1 D 8 8 Pending
28 Naz Hillmon GSV @ ATL Assists 1.5 41.1 D 9.3 5 Pending
29 Jordin Canada GSV @ ATL 3-Pointers Made 1.5 40.5 D 17.9 0 Pending
30 Allisha Gray GSV @ ATL Points 16.5 40.5 D 10.4 4 Pending
31 Angel Reese GSV @ ATL Assists 2.5 39.6 D 11.7 5 Pending
32 A.J. Green MIL MIL @ WSH Assists 1.5 39.1 D 13.4 5 Pending
33 Rui Hachimura LAC LAC @ SAC 3-Pointers Made 2.5 39 D 7.1 0 Pending
34 PHX PHX PHX @ POR ML -110 38.9 D 7.7 8 Pending
35 Angel Reese GSV @ ATL Rebounds 11.5 38.4 D 12.2 5 Pending
36 MIA MIA MIA @ MIN ML -110 38.3 D 6.6 8 Pending
37 Gabby Williams GSV @ ATL Assists 3.5 37.8 D 10.2 5 Pending
38 Gabby Williams GSV @ ATL Rebounds 4.5 37.5 D 8.6 5 Pending
39 Austin Reaves LAL GSW @ LAL Points 24.5 36.3 D 14.5 4 Pending
40 Allisha Gray GSV @ ATL Rebounds 3.5 35 D 9.6 5 Pending
41 LAC LAC LAC @ SAC ML -110 34.1 D 5.9 8 Pending
42 CHI CHI CHI @ TOR ML -110 33.3 D 6.1 8 Pending
43 IND IND IND @ NOP ML -110 32.6 D 5.7 8 Pending
44 GSW GSW GSW @ LAL ML -110 31.5 D 6.3 8 Pending
45 CHA CHA CHA @ BKN ML -110 30.6 D 5.4 8 Pending
46 Naz Hillmon GSV @ ATL Points 5.5 30.3 D 7.8 4 Pending
47 UTA UTA UTA @ MEM ML -110 30.1 D 5.7 8 Pending
48 Max Christie DAL HOU @ DAL Points 10.5 29.7 D 1.5 -5 Pending
49 Allisha Gray GSV @ ATL Assists 2.5 29 D 6.6 5 Pending
50 Reed Sheppard HOU HOU @ DAL Points 9.5 28.9 D 2 -5 Pending
Showing 26–50 of 569 picks

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.